AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Mohammad Naveed

CIS129 · CIS113 · CIS127 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade and are comfortable teaching yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredPoor ResponsivenessEasy AWeak LecturesAvoided By Students
  • Students frequently say the class is easy to pass but offers little teaching value.
  • Most negative reviews describe him as inactive, unresponsive, or overly dependent on the book.
  • Online and in-person reviews are both mostly negative, though and flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

The A is very easy because every reported grade is A-range and and low difficulty.

Both online and , though both also warn that learning may be self-directed.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course workload and , but the content may require self-teaching because instruction is weak.

Online reviews emphasize low activity and poor responsiveness, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews do , and online sections suggest a flexible structure by default.

Online evidence suggests flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because they feel .

Both online and positive outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because all reported grades are A-range despite very low teaching-quality ratings.

Format shift

Both formats show easy A outcomes.

Workload

Featherlight

94/100

Students describe barely any homework and very low difficulty across the course.

Format shift

Online , while and difficulty ratings also suggest low workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe him as inactive, unresponsive, useless, or not actually teaching the material.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews criticize teaching, though .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework, assignments, book exercises, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is stronger in online reviews, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and say the class depends on the book rather than useful instruction.

Main concern

Students say the professor adds little value beyond the textbook.

What students said

“you are on your own”
CIS129
“the professor is useless.”
CIS129

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe low workload, easy grades, weak teaching, and poor responsiveness, with one positive support-focused outlier.

Main concern

The main concern is having to learn independently with limited instructor engagement.

What students said

“He's inactive. He doesn't do anything.”
CIS113
“this guy does not teach anything”
CIS129
“Professor hardly emails you back.”
CIS127

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, finals, or testing strictness.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Just go to library, checkout a Node js book and learn on your own and save your money, this guy does not teach anything, by the way his terrible brief lectures are with typos and absolutely terrible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“this guy does not teach anything”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“AVOID. .”

📈 Easy A Path

96/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's inactive. He doesn't do anything.
  • The own
  • Terrible, just buy the book and do the exercises on your own

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • The book for this class was great, it has a lot of examples.
  • He went a .

Theme 3

📬 About Support

  • He helped me several times outside of class and extended to due dates.
  • Professor hardly emails you back.
  • he'll claim to get back to you, and never does.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 7 reviews are available, but the negative pattern is consistent across both formats and several courses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CIS1294 reviews
CIS1132 reviews
CIS1271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values