AI Rate Professor

Design

Lilya Vorobey

CRN97175 · DRAF121 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her only if , and a strict classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy HomeworkUnclear Assignment RequirementsHelpful If AskedStrict Classroom Control
  • Online reviews describe unclear requirements, fast pacing, and .
  • In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising her help and others reporting strict or humiliating behavior.
  • Success depends heavily on self-direction, peer support, and asking for help early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but comments , and working through unclear directions.

Online evidence is much harder and heavier, while if students seek help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content and software workflow feel challenging because lessons can move fast and details are not always directly explained.

Online reviews emphasize fast pacing and difficult lesson plans, while in-person reviews emphasize figuring out handout details independently.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance does not appear strictly daily, but students and projects harder.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because severe online workload complaints and one negative in-person experience outweigh the helpful-students-can-succeed comments.

Online reviews are negative, while and serious concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because one online review tags her as a and successful students stress following expectations closely.

Format shift

Online evidence is harsher, while but still expects careful work.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy, especially online, with reports of 7-10 hours of and difficult assignments.

Format shift

Online , while in-person reviews focus more on projects, handouts, and class support.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent because some students find her helpful, but , and harsh classroom behavior.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as confusing and difficult, while and overly strict.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and in-person comments emphasize assignment-based work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

motivated students and strict, uncomfortable classroom control.

Main concern

Students may need to tolerate strict oversight and rely on self-guided learning.

What students said

“She will help you if you put in the effort.”
DRAF121
“she may humiliate you in front of the class even if .”
DRAF121

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report confusing assignment information, fast lesson pacing, and .

Main concern

Assignment requirements and and overwhelming.

What students said

“She .”
DRAF121
“7-10 hours of and lots of tutors, this class was the hardest.”
CRN97175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, quiz format, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“7-10 hours of and lots of tutors, this class was the hardest.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She will help you if you put in the effort.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“7-10 hours of and lots of tutors, this class was the hardest.”

⚖️ Classroom Experience

35/100

“she may humiliate you in front of the class even if .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • This was the most difficult class I have ever taken.
  • 7-10 hours of and lots of tutors, this class was the hardest.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will help you if you put in the effort.
  • She .
  • She is very willing to help if you ask.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Concerns

  • she is too strict on what the students are supposed to be doing
  • she may humiliate you in front of the class even if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and but mixed evidence over several years.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

DRAF1214 reviews
CRN971751 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1