AI Rate Professor

Communication

Angelina Moles

COMM110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and a positive classroom environment.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringRespectfulCreative FreedomClear LecturesSupportive Guidance
  • Students describe her class as respectful, caring, and centered on individual learning.
  • Assignments allow creative freedom and .
  • All reviewed students earned A or A+ grades and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

A or A+ grades are common in these reviews, but participation and group work still matter.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content seems approachable because and the class environment is supportive, though public speaking participation is expected.

Only in-person reviews describe the course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Reviews emphasize participation but do not clearly prove a .

The attendance evidence comes only from in-person participation-focused comments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and available for guidance.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

All reported grades are A or A+, and comments .

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Assignments include creative work and participation, but students do not describe the workload as heavy.

Format shift

and class participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Students consistently describe her as , and highly supportive.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on assignments, participation, and group discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely , and a safe class environment.

Main concern

Students should be comfortable with participation and group talk.

What students said

“If you ever need .”
comm110
“ .”
comm110
“We were able to create a safe environment for everybody and actually be friends with the classmates.”
comm110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Angelina is simply the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“ .”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“If you ever need .”

📈 Grade Value

86/100

“There is a lot of creative freedom with the and you can tell she truly cares for her students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Her classes are fun and exciting.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She really care for her student and is always there if you need something.
  • Professor Moles is sure to instill from the start of the semester that her class is all about respect with the main focus on being how each person learns individually.

Theme 3

🤝 About Class Environment

  • A lot of group talk since is a public speaking class, but that was amazing.
  • We were able to create a safe environment for everybody and actually be friends with the classmates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The reviews are consistent and detailed, but the sample size is only three.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

comm1103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values