AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Bruce Maule

ACTG · ACTG169 · ACCT169 · ACTG118 · ATCG196 · ACCOUNTING169 · ACTG106 · ACTG107 · ACC121 · ETHNICS169 · ACTG100 · ACTG108 · ACTG103 · ACC106 · ACT103 · ACTG16190165 · ACT100 · 270 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
95.95%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Maule if you want a and reading are rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear online structureEncouraging feedbackWork-ahead flexibilityWriting-heavyPractical course material
  • Students overwhelmingly recommend Maule for , and practical accounting content.
  • Many courses are online-friendly and allow students to work ahead or finish early if they follow announcements and the syllabus.
  • The workload can include substantial reading and weekly essays, but , and lenient.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A grades are common when students follow clear instructions, submit work on time, and handle the .

Online reviews strongly support an easy A with structure, while but mention a fair amount of work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The and practical, though , and fast pacing keep it from being effortless.

Online courses feel easier because instructions and pacing are flexible, while and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

Reviews emphasize online flexibility, working ahead, and .

Online evidence strongly supports flexibility, while in-person reviews also mention working ahead but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students highly recommend him because , and easy to work with.

Both online and evidence from online classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

and generally lenient, with generous late policy mentions and many A grades for completed work.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest leniency evidence, while and .

Workload

Moderate

64/100

The workload is manageable but not tiny because , and detailed writing.

Format shift

Online classes often allow pacing flexibility, while and writing requirements.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, responsiveness, encouragement, organization, and practical teaching value.

Format shift

Online evidence is exceptionally strong, and in-person reviews also describe him as accessible and helpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Grades appear driven , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention essays and assignments, while and cases.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, accessibility, and fair work, though writing can be demanding.

Main concern

Some in-person-labeled reviews still describe online-style flexibility, so format-specific interpretation should be cautious.

What students said

“Writing an , but the professor always encouraged students with warm words.”
ACTG169
“you can work ahead of time he gives very positive feedback he's quick to get back to you”
ACTG107
“The course requires a fair amount of work but I found it to be very interesting on real life cases”
ACTG169

Remote format

Online

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe clear course , and strong support.

Main concern

Some online classes require lots of , and attention to announcements.

What students said

“For an .”
ACTG107
“He has everything ready ahead of time, so if you like, you can also work ahead of time.”
ACT103
“8 week course with 8 essays - one essay a week.”
ACTG169

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one accounting course mentions quizzes, midterm, and final using homework-style problems.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyHomework And Quizzes Reuse Practice Problems

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove In-Person Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Exam PolicyHomework And Quizzes Reuse Practice Problems
“All the in-class practice is the same problems in the hw, and then all the Q's in the hw are on the ”
ACTG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , he is pretty responsive and encouraging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and always helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ AND AGAIN!!”

📝 Workload Reality

64/100

“Lots of , but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very chill and cares about his students deeply.
  • He responded to the .
  • and always helpful.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of , but .
  • 8 week course with 8 essays - one essay a week.
  • Just be prepared to watch/read a lot of material and then .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Structure

  • Follow instructions on course homepage, read the emails from prof maule, and you will pass.
  • .
  • The and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

270

Lifetime ratings

98/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent and detailed reviews show very consistent patterns of , and writing-based workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5218
4 out of 528
3 out of 513
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ACTG16911 reviews
ACTG1188 reviews
ACCOUNTING1696 reviews
ACT1034 reviews
ACTG1074 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ACTG1063 reviews
ACCT1692 reviews
ACTG1082 reviews
ACTG161901652 reviews
ACC1061 review
ACC1211 review
ACT1001 review
ACTG1 review
ACTG1001 review
ACTG1031 review
ATCG1961 review
ETHNICS1691 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

46

A+ 20 · A 25 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1