AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cynthia Moss

MATH200 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy HomeworkWeak Teaching PresenceTest HeavyNo Late Work
  • Students consistently report a .
  • Teaching presence is weak, with one student saying they were expected to learn mostly on their own.
  • Tests and no-late-work rules make the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades can be decent, but lots of , and no late work make an A costly.

All evidence comes from Online reviews, and there are no In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

One student found the material uncomplicated, but weak teaching support makes the course harder to manage.

Only Online reviews describe course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , but the no-late-work policy shows limited flexibility around coursework.

Only Online reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because the workload is heavy and the teaching presence is weak.

All recommendation evidence is from Online reviews, with no In person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

No late work, tough grader tags, and strict grading.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Both reviews emphasize heavy and busy work.

Format shift

Only Online reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Accessibility helps slightly, but one student says the class has almost no real teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews are the only teaching evidence and lean negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

70/100

Grades involve homework, forum participation, and tests, though .

Format shift

Only Online reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe useful access and a free book, but the and limited teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to learn independently while managing a lot of homework and .

What students said

“There is a LOT of hw, mostly busy work, which is super- for me.”
Math-200
“She is non-existent as a teacher, you are given twice weekly online homework that you are just expected to understand without any real teaching.”
Math-200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

TestsTest HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

TestsTest HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proved
“ .”
Math-200
“ .”
Math-200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is non-existent as a teacher, you are given twice weekly online homework that you are just expected to understand without any real teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She provides you with a 2 page online packet every week that has example problems and that is the full extent of her teaching.”

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“There is a LOT of hw, mostly busy work, which is super- for me.”

⚖️

28/100

“There is a no late work policy and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is non-existent as a teacher, you are given twice weekly online homework that you are just expected to understand without any real teaching.
  • and helpful, but because of HW amount.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a LOT of hw, mostly busy work, which is super- for me.
  • There is a no late work policy and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small but detailed, recent, and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Math-2002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values