AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Mousa Ghanma

CHEM192 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want a , but expect some communication risk in .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsHelpfulProfessional gradingAccent concerns
  • Students describe him as helpful and able to make chemistry more interesting.
  • The online review is much stronger than the older in-person reviews.
  • hard to understand.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The only reported grade is an A- with and low online difficulty, but .

Online evidence suggests low effort for a good grade, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students say he makes a difficult chemistry subject understandable, though chemistry itself is not described as effortless.

, while because of difficulty and accent concerns.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One online tag says participation matters, but reviews do not prove a .

Only the online review mentions participation, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and clear, with one notable communication concern.

Online recommendation is very strong, while but less consistent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

The online review , but there is not enough evidence for .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is positive, while .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Reviews , so workload appears moderate by default.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is repeatedly described as helpful and engaging, with one in-person concern about understandability.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is excellent, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, but one reports difficulty understanding his accent.

Main concern

Accent clarity may affect comprehension.

What students said

“Very dedicated and helpful.”
CHEM192
“his accent makes him hard to understand”
CHEM192

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review and .

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“Turns difficult subject understandable and interesting.”
CHEM192

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Turns difficult subject understandable and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, helpfulness, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Turns difficult subject understandable and interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ ”

⚠️ Communication Risk

70/100

“his accent makes him hard to understand”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Turns difficult subject understandable and interesting.
  • Very dedicated and helpful. Made the chemistry interesting

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Fair and professional evaluations and grading.

Theme 3

💬 About Clarity

  • his accent makes him hard to understand
  • always willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and two are very old, so confidence is limited despite a consistent helpfulness theme.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1923 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values