AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Latha Gopinath

MATH91575 · MATH200 · MATH222 · MATH241 · STAT200 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself statistics or math and tolerate a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTough GraderTest HeavyDisorganizedHeavy Homework
  • Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because , and disorganized.
  • Grades are described as harsh, test-dependent, and difficult even for students with stronger math backgrounds.
  • Both online and in-person reviews , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

An A appears very difficult because students report , and .

Both formats show poor grade value, with and in-person reviews emphasizing failure risk and disorganization.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The material feels much harder because , and often leave students teaching themselves.

Online and in-person comments both describe the course as difficult, but online students .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students say skipping class means you will not pass, even though class often does not help enough.

, while online evidence mainly shows difficulty keeping up with lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students almost unanimously advise avoiding her because of , and poor support.

Both formats are strongly negative, with no meaningful recommendation support in the online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

6/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and describe grades as .

Format shift

Online reviews mention redo tests, zeros, and public criticism, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Workload is heavy because many reviews mention lots of , and large assignment chunks.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with .

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Most students , and can be condescending or unsupportive.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially severe about stress and shaming, while and poor organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are described as test-heavy and sometimes strictly based on test scores, with .

Format shift

Both formats point to exam-heavy assessment, especially MATH200.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also highly negative, with repeated complaints about , and .

Main concern

Students report needing to learn on their own while .

What students said

“Stay Away. Very nice but .”
MATH200
“youll be learning everything on your own”
MATH200
“This class was a mess. .”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are extremely negative, citing , public shaming, tough grading, and .

Main concern

Students say the , and harshly graded.

What students said

“This is the .”
MATH200
“ and has a bad habit of publicly shaming test answers that were wrong.”
MATH200
“I would have given her a 0 if I could.”
MATH241

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and unclear preparation rather than student-friendly exam policies.

Test HeavyStrict Test ScoresRedo TestsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

14/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and are harsh, but they do not clearly prove closed-book format, proctoring, or .

Test HeavyStrict Test ScoresFew Graded Items
“Grade .”
MATH200
“LITERALLY ONLY PASSED BASED ON FORTURN.”
MATH200
“How TF did half the and another 10% fail???”
MATH200

Online

, and criticism after test results, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Test HeavyRedo TestsZero Risk
“ if you score well, or gives you a zero”
MATH200
“Would spend 30 minutes after every test talking about how all the problems were super easy”
MATH241
“ .”
MATH200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“She is just as bad as everyone has rated her, she is rude, condescending, and , and .”

⚖️

6/100

“Grade .”

👍 Recommendation Level

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • so weak for a math professor.
  • Barely goes over chapters and leaves you with little to no notes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • How TF did half the and another 10% fail???
  • Grade .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • it leaves you constantly on edge.
  • Don't waste your time and money on this class w/ this professor.
  • This class was a mess. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 19 reviews across several years are detailed and consistently negative across both formats.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH20015 reviews
MATH2221 review
MATH2411 review
MATH915751 review
STAT2001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 7