AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Denise Hum

MATH225 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you value a supportive professor and can handle a heavy, fast-moving workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive teacherHeavy homeworkClear gradingProject-based finalAttendance-sensitive pace
  • Students describe Denise Hum as kind, supportive, and willing to help.
  • Online students report a more manageable class with recorded lectures and a .
  • In-person evidence warns of , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A appears to require steady work because one review mentions , but the and tough grading.

Online evidence is more grade-friendly with , while and heavier effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course is not described as conceptually impossible, but the pace, lectures, and .

Online evidence suggests a manageable structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but missing in-person classes makes students fall behind quickly.

Online evidence mentions recorded lectures, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Students like her support and kindness, but the recommendation is limited by heavy workload and .

The online student highly recommends her, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grading looks mixed because and , while another tags her as a tough grader.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is more lenient, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is a major concern because the and overwhelming assignments.

Format shift

Online work seems more supported by in-class project time, while as heavy and overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Her teaching is helped by kindness, support, recorded lectures, and willingness to help students succeed.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, though the online review is much more enthusiastic.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and a semester-long project than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly replaces the , while and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The but describes the class as lecture-heavy with and little room to miss class.

Main concern

The workload can become overwhelming and missing class makes students fall behind quickly.

What students said

“Be prepared to do a lot of homework!”
MATH225
“We met 3 times a week and if you missed any classes, you'd fall behind very quickly.”
MATH225

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive, , and a semester-long project instead of a final test.

Main concern

Participation matters, and the workload structure still requires steady engagement.

What students said

“Professor Hum is an amazing teacher!”
MATH225
“Instead of a project, which most of it was completed during class.”
MATH225

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The semester-long project instead of a , while other exam policies are not clearly proven.

Semester-Long ProjectNo Final Test Clearly Reported OnlineReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Rules

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, or .

Online

The online review says there was a work completed during class.

Semester-Long ProjectNo Final Test
“Instead of a project, which most of it was completed during class.”
MATH225

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is very nice and will do everything she can to help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Hum is an amazing teacher!”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Be prepared to do a lot of homework!”

👍 Recommendation Split

65/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • This professor is very nice and will do everything she can to help you succeed.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Pace

  • It was overwhelming at times how many lectures and .
  • We met 3 times a week and if you missed any classes, you'd fall behind very quickly.

Theme 3

📝 About Assessment

  • Instead of a project, which most of it was completed during class.
  • She also records her lectures which was useful to me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and each format has just one review, so the pattern is useful but not strong.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2252 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values