AI Rate Professor

English

Rebecca Webb

ENGLISH828 · ENG848 · ENGL100 · ENGL848 · ENGLJB · COMP10101 · ENG100 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and can handle a heavy revision-based class with an uneven lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWriting heavyPeer review focusedHelpful feedbackRambling lecturesMixed teaching style
  • and say the writing practice improves their essays.
  • The course usually requires many essays, revisions, peer reviews, and portfolios.
  • A recurring complaint is that she talks about herself, rambles, or lacks structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Getting an A seems realistic if , and portfolios, but the writing workload is not effortless.

The Easy A , while the single online review gives no grade-friendly evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is basic writing practice, but repeated essays, revisions, and .

but writing-heavy course, while the online review mainly criticizes lecture delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

notices attendance and others saying missing class did not matter much.

, while the online review says participation matters and skipping class is risky.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and improvement, but many hesitate because of rambling, strictness, and heavy writing.

, while the lone online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

submit all writing packets and revisions, but missing work can hurt.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly address grading.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and portfolios.

Format shift

The heavy workload evidence comes from in-person writing courses, with little workload detail from the online review.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

She is often helpful and motivating, but complaints about rambling, personal stories, and weak structure are frequent.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed but , while the online review describes poor engagement and repetition.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Assessment is centered on essays, revisions, peer reviews, writing packets, workshops, and portfolios rather than exams.

Format shift

, while the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but , and stricter than expected.

Main concern

Students should expect lots of , and peer review work.

What students said

“As long as you do the .”
ENG100
“she's tough, but .”
ENG848
“Wrote about 30 pages total.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and says lectures were boring, repetitive, and scolding.

Main concern

The online class may feel rambling and .

What students said

“She spends most of the time rambling and repeating herself.”
COMP10101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and writing assignments, and they do not clearly prove a .

Portfolio FinalEssay-Based AssessmentPeer Review

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support a portfolio and essay-based structure, but do .

Portfolio FinalEssay RevisionsPeer Review
“for ”
ENG100
“Make sure you attend all writer's workshops and peer reviews because they determine your grade at the end of the class.”
ENGL100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she's tough, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“she's tough, but .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“be prepared to write a lot!”

⚖️ Grade Path

68/100

“As long as you do the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She spends most of the time rambling and repeating herself.
  • She does tend to talk about outside of class stories a lot, but other than that she is an awesome teacher.
  • Good teacher; wish there were more structure though.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Work

  • be prepared to write a lot!
  • Wrote about 30 pages total.
  • She assigned extensive revisions of and one new one during the last FOUR weeks of class!

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • As long as you do the .
  • she is not an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

83/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 21 reviews span many years and show consistent , and rambling.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1006 reviews
ENG8485 reviews
ENGL8483 reviews
ENGLISH8283 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
COMP101011 review
ENGLJB1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1