AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Stephanie Cheung

ACTG163 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if possible, but unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from publisher materials.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFormat-dependent experienceStrong in personWeak online supportDaunting materialTextbook-driven online
  • Reviews are sharply split between a poor online experience and an excellent in-person experience.
  • Online students reported almost no instructor-created teaching, while the and enthusiasm.
  • Both students earned A grades, but the course material can still feel demanding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Both reviewers received A grades, but one found the and the other called audit material daunting.

Online evidence suggests an A may require self-teaching, while in-person evidence suggests strong guidance through hard material.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Audit content is explicitly described as daunting, and the online format made learning harder by relying on publisher materials.

The but well explained, while the online review says the format lacked teaching support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format because the , while the .

Online evidence is negative and , so the recommendation is format-dependent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Both reported A grades, but comments do .

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviewers earned A grades, but .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , though the online class appears publisher-driven and the material itself is demanding.

Format shift

Online evidence points to textbook-platform work, while workload volume.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is split, with one online review describing minimal instruction and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is poor, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The online review mentions assignments, materials, and exams through the publisher, but the .

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly mentions publisher-facilitated assignments and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review is highly positive and praises her experience, enthusiasm, and .

Main concern

The material in audit is described as daunting even with helpful teaching.

What students said

“It is a privilege to learn from Stephanie.”
ACTG163
“The material in audit can be daunting to say the least.”
ACTG163

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and says the class relied almost entirely on textbook publisher materials.

Main concern

The student reported , no supplementary materials, and .

What students said

“You'd .”
ACTG163
“Cheung offered , no supplementary materials, no original assignments, no facilitation of discussion, and even graded late.”
ACTG163

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mentioned only as publisher-facilitated online items, with no clear evidence of .

Publisher-Facilitated ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review says exams were facilitated through the textbook publisher, but .

Publisher-Facilitated ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“All assignments, materials, and .”
ACTG163

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'd .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split between online and in-person experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Cheung offered , no supplementary materials, no original assignments, no facilitation of discussion, and even graded late.”

🔀 Format Split

50/100

“It is a privilege to learn from Stephanie.”

📚 Course Difficulty

35/100

“The material in audit can be daunting to say the least.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • This professor was a disappointment and appeared to do only the bare minimum.
  • All assignments, materials, and .
  • You'd .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • Her wide breadth of experience, zest for teaching and enthusiastic attitude for the profession make this course an absolute delight.
  • her calm and comprehensible way makes the course a treat.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The material in audit can be daunting to say the least.
  • A++

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, and they conflict sharply by format, so confidence is limited despite detailed comments.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACTG1632 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values