AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Marsha Ramezane

FITN · ENGL202 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Marsha Ramezane looks best for students who want supportive guidance, but confidence is limited by only four reviews.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful counselorCaring personalityEasy experienceLimited review baseOne severe outlier
  • Recent counseling reviews are very positive and describe her as helpful, caring, and informative.
  • The small review count limits certainty, especially because one older review is extremely negative.
  • Difficulty appears low, but the data is mostly about counseling or activity-based classes rather than graded academic workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and comments do not describe heavy graded work, but grade evidence is missing.

, and there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Reviews describe counseling support and a fitness class as easy to engage with rather than intellectually difficult.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews , though one counseling review says she calls on time.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students praise her as helpful and caring, but one severe negative review keeps the .

The recommendation score .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

There is , but low difficulty ratings and positive support comments suggest a forgiving experience.

Format shift

and is limited.

Workload

Light

85/100

Reviews , and the reported difficulty is very low.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Three reviews are strongly positive about her support and personality, while one older review is sharply negative.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and mostly describe counseling support or activity-based participation.

Format shift

All and is weak.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as caring, helpful, informative, and easy to work with.

Main concern

The main concern is low evidence volume and one harsh older negative review.

What students said

“ , and is informative”
ENGL202
“Great counselor. ”
ENGL202
“Marsha Ramezane is completely incompetent at her job”
ENGL202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great counselor. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, class experience, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Support Quality

82/100

“Great counselor. ”

👍 Recommendation Signal

78/100

“ , and is informative”

⚠️ Credibility Limit

38/100

“Marsha Ramezane is completely incompetent at her job”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • , and is informative
  • Great counselor.

Theme 2

🏃 About Class Experience

  • In her class, she makes us sweat like crazy;really gets ya movin.
  • she's one of the most logical and sensible, too.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She has done nothing to help any student from my experience
  • I hope I never have the pain of coming across her ever again in my life.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and contexts, and one severe outlier conflicts with recent praise.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL2023 reviews
FITN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values