Anton Zoughbie

PHIL101 · PHILJA · PHIL105 · PHIL240 · PHILOSOPHY100 · PHIL100 · CLASSSECT · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 76/100
RMP rating: 3.5/5
Take again: 66.67%
Difficulty: 2.2

The decision

He can be a good choice in person if and tolerate uneven lectures, but the online evidence is weak.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOpen-note examsInteresting but uneven lecturesLenient gradingCan be confusingParticipation matters

Many in-person students describe the class as easy to pass because exams are open-note and .
some find him inspiring and interesting, while .
The single online review is negative, , and weak lecture support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A good grade is very reachable because , and lenient grading, though some students say it still takes reading and notes.

The Easy A signal is mostly in-person, while the lone online review .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is often called easy or common sense, but some students find the .

In-person reviews mostly show beginner-level difficulty with mixed challenge, while the online review points to poor organization rather than easy content.

Is attendance flexible?

WorthIt

66/100

and lenient in-person classes, but repeated complaints about confusion and disorganization limit the recommendation.

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive, while the single online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Multiple in-person reviews cite , and lenient grading, despite a few complaints about hard assignments.

Format shift

; the online review does not clearly support grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students mention reading, notes, essays, group work, and presentations, but many still describe the class as manageable or easy.

Format shift

In-person workload is moderate and manageable, while online work issues are tied to organization.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is often described as interesting, helpful, and thought-provoking, but a .

Format shift

In-person teaching is polarized but generally positive, while online teaching is described as disorganized and less useful than the book.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, essays, presentations, group work, and , so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment evidence; the online review mentions assignments but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but , and lenient grading.

Main concern

Lectures and .

What students said

“HE LETS YOU USE ANY NOTES. LITERALLY. ANY NOTES.”
PHIL100

“He gives tons of and so .”
PHIL101

“ and the material and book is too hard in my opinion for a 100 class”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes canceled Zoom meetings, off-topic lectures, and .

Main concern

Online organization and lecture reliability are the main problems.

What students said

“about half of them got cancelled.”
PHIL240

“the book taught me more than he did.”
PHIL240

“He and had to change due dates because .”
PHIL240

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

them student-friendly despite some reports of difficult questions.

Open NotesTake-Home Tests Or QuizzesExtra CreditReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly mention open-note exams and , though difficulty varies.

Open NotesTake-Home Tests Or QuizzesDifficult Questions Mentioned

“You need to get good grades on the but they can be taken WITH notes.”
PHIL100

“HE LETS YOU USE ANY NOTES. LITERALLY. ANY NOTES.”
PHIL100

“ !”
PHIL100

“Only upside of this class is that the tests, quizzes, and .”
PHIL100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or proctoring policy.

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Honestly, I don't understand how anyone can do poorly in this class. He lets you use ANY NOTES. and outlines the questions for multiple choice/true and false, so you know exactly what to read.”
Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“He challenged me to question my views of the world and .”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Do all the reading/hw and you're guaranteed an A.”

🧪

82/100

“HE LETS YOU USE ANY NOTES. LITERALLY. ANY NOTES.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“He and had to change due dates because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

I found his lectures very interesting.
He is a great professor. and the material and book is too hard in my opinion for a 100 class but he is so helpful.
. Can't understand what he says half the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This class is basically common sense and should be an easy pass!
He gives tons of and so .
I passed the class with an A but it was a very hard A.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

You can but if you don't think when putting your notes .
!
tests, quizzes, and .

Theme 4

⚠️ About Online Format

about half of them got cancelled.
the book taught me more than he did.
He and had to change due dates because .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 24 reviews across many years with repeated themes, though the online sample is only one review and older reviews dominate.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58

4 out of 56

3 out of 55

2 out of 53

1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL10016 reviews

PHILOSOPHY1002 reviews

407271 review

CLASSSECT1 review

PHIL1011 review

Show 3 more courses

PHIL1051 review

PHIL2401 review

PHILJA1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B+ 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Anton Zoughbie

He can be a good choice in person if x x x x and tolerate uneven lectures, but the online evidence is weak.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

EasyA

Beginner

Recommended

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Easy A Potential

🧪 x x

⚠️ Organization Risk

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🧪 About Exams

⚠️ About Online Format

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

He can be a good choice in person if and tolerate uneven lectures, but the online evidence is weak.

🧪