AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Geoffrey Hirsch

MATH · ALG111 · MATH112 · MATH222 · MATH111 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkTest heavyLow supportStrict attendance
  • Most students , and little useful help.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as excessive, especially in MATH222 and MATH112.
  • Grades appear hard to earn because tests are difficult and support is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students report , and failing even after major effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content feels harder because as .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because one student says he made the class stay for the entire time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students warn against taking him because they , and little help.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because students report failing or receiving low grades despite tutors, extra work, and effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

Workload is described as excessive, including about 150 homework questions per week.

Format shift

The heavy workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Teaching is mostly described as confusing, book-based, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention hard tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and hard tests.

Main concern

Students while managing a heavy workload.

What students said

“He doesn't teach and the .”
MATH222
“I needed a tutor, went to math lab, went early every class session to work with the student teacher. I still failed.”
MATH112
“The .”
MATH222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyGrades Depend On Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyGrades Depend On Tests
“He doesn't teach and the .”
MATH222
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH112
“ ”
MATH112

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He doesn't teach and the .”

📚 Workload Pressure

8/100

“He assigns about 150 questions a week and it has cut into my time for other classes.”

⚖️ Grade Difficulty

15/100

“even with all my effort&time&work,he gave me a D+ not a C-.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just follows the book and still you get nothing useful out of him, you'll feel like being in a self-teaching class.
  • HIS METHOD OF !!
  • Finally a teacher who knows how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I needed a tutor, went to math lab, went early every class session to work with the student teacher. I still failed.
  • The .
  • I am no math brain and got an A in this class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • RUN FROM THIS GUY, YOU WILL FAIL.
  • .
  • If .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years show a consistent negative pattern, though some older and conflicting positive comments reduce certainty.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1126 reviews
MATH2222 reviews
1121 review
ALG1111 review
MATH1 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1111 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1