AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nayereh Rezaie

CHEM100 · CHEM410 · CHEM220 · CHEM210 · CHEM · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself chemistry and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHard examsBoring lecture styleSelf-teaching requiredWeak support
  • Most students describe lectures as and textbooks.
  • as hard, test-heavy, and poorly matched to preparation.
  • A few students mention lenient grading or , but the dominant experience is frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A usually requires strong self-study, because exams are hard and lecture support is weak despite occasional or .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The chemistry content feels harder because .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as important, but several reviews suggest lecture value was limited and self-study mattered more.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they found the and the exams difficult.

, and they are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students mention or lenient lab grading, but and few graded items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of homework, labs, reading, and , though a .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most comments describe lectures as boring, unclear, disorganized, or unhelpful despite a few positive outliers.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students repeatedly mention hard tests, quizzes, finals, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently , and heavy reliance on self-study.

Main concern

Students often say lectures do not prepare them well for exams.

What students said

“ . Hard to understand.”
CHEM210
“Exams and .”
CHEM210
“You really need to teach yourself.”
CHEM210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because and weak preparation, but reviews do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring requirements.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyFew Graded ItemsFinal May Include Barely Covered Material

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Hard ExamsTest HeavyFew Graded Items
“ .”
CHEM210
“Gives extremely hard tests that even hours of studying don't prepare you for.”
CHEM210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want a teacher you can learn from.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“ .”

⚠️

25/100

“Gives extremely hard tests that even hours of studying don't prepare you for.”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“Stay away!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very boring and sometimes she dumb things down too much.
  • Her lectures are pointless and they don't make any sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Exams and .
  • Minimal things to be graded, so you don't have much wiggle-room to bring your grade up.
  • If u listen and put in effort u can do well, if not u will get left behind.

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Fit

  • You'll need to study at home.
  • You really need to teach yourself.
  • The only ones who got good grades were the ones that already had a very strong foundation in chemistry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 36 reviews span many years and show a strong, repeated pattern of and .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 516

Course coverage

CHEM21031 reviews
CHEM2202 reviews
CHEM1 review
CHEM1001 review
CHEM4101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1