AI Rate Professor

Film

Jason Jakaitis

FILM130 · FILM100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you like film , and a professor students strongly disagree about.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing lecturerTough graderReading heavyPassionate about filmParticipation matters
  • some find him inspiring, while .
  • In-person reviews often praise his passion but warn that , and .
  • Online evidence is mixed, with one clear and structured review and and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A-range grades, but comments repeatedly say grades , and tolerance for .

Online reviews split between clear structure and , while and tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is an intro film course, but , and tough exams make it feel harder than basic.

Online structure may be clearer in one section, but and graded participation demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Attendance and participation are described as very important, and skipping class makes passing much harder.

, while online reviews emphasize weekly participation posts.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

He is worth it for students who like passionate lectures, but many others .

Online and and strong warnings in each format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple reviews call him a tough or though one student mentions a .

Format shift

Online reviews include hard forum grading, and , and grades.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews , and long readings.

Format shift

Online workload is structured weekly, while , and participation.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

His passion and charisma impress some students, but others describe him as .

Format shift

and vague feedback, while in-person feedback is highly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and forums, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but polarizing lecturer whose class can reward attention while frustrating students who need clearer support.

Main concern

The main in-person risk is harsh or and .

What students said

“You have to work extremely hard to get an A.”
FILM100
“Jason is a charismatic lecturer and his passion for his subject was contagious.”
FILM100
“He is a .”
FILM100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews conflict, with one calling expectations clear and and .

Main concern

The biggest and unless requested.

What students said

“ , and there are no surprises.”
FILM100
“VERY hard grader and if you request it and .”
FILM130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, book policy, or .

QuizzesThree ExamsEssaysReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays, with tests described as tough, but do not clearly prove book or .

Three ExamsEssaysTough Tests
“3 exams and two essays.”
FILM100
“The .”
FILM100

Online

Online reviews mention graded quizzes, but do not clearly .

Graded QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“Each week consists of a chapter to read, a video lecture, a film, and a graded quiz and forum post.”
FILM100
“The if you read the material and watch the films.”
FILM130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jason is a charismatic lecturer and his passion for his subject was contagious.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Jason is passionate and enthusiastic about the material he teaches.”

⚖️

28/100

“He is a .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Try to get into any other film class, asks for one thing but then wants the opposite.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jason is a charismatic lecturer and his passion for his subject was contagious.
  • His enthusiasm and passion for his subject was palpable.
  • This man is terrible. He sucks at helping and expects people to be fluent in film terms.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work extremely hard to get an A.
  • VERY hard grader and if you request it and .
  • The . But there was always a .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • Each week consists of a chapter to read, a video lecture, a film, and a graded quiz and forum post.
  • Attendance and participation are very important.
  • There was a lot of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed but , and workload.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FILM10010 reviews
FILM1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2