AI Rate Professor

English

Rena Anderson

ENG105 · ENG110 · ENGL100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her only if you are ready for and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingMany PapersViewpoint-Sensitive GradingHelpful FeedbackMixed Lectures
  • , and homework.
  • Several reviews say grades depend on aligning with her beliefs.
  • Some students value her advice, lectures, and reading selections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades are possible, but , and pressure to match her views.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is reading-heavy and writing-heavy, with essays and reflections requiring sustained effort.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Two reviews use the tag Skip class? .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students and lectures and rejecting the heavy workload and viewpoint-sensitive grading.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple students say better essay grades require siding with her beliefs, and one tag calls her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and multiple essays.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students praise her advice and lectures, while others criticize her professionalism and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize essays, reading, homework, and reflections, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with praise for feedback and lectures but and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say the workload is heavy and views.

What students said

“There is a lot of reading and .”
ENG105
“If you want a better grade, you have to write siding with her beliefs.”
ENGL100
“Her class was very interesting. I loved the novels she made us read.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reflections but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Exam Policy UnclearEssay-Heavy Course
“She gives 4 essays in the semester.”
ENGL100
“You have to read every other day, and write kinds of reflections about what you read.”
ENG110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a better grade, you have to write siding with her beliefs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

25/100

“If you want a better grade, you have to write siding with her beliefs.”

📚 Workload Intensity

20/100

“There is a lot of reading and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Her class was very interesting. I loved the novels she made us read.”

Theme 1

📚

  • There is a lot of reading and .
  • She has you do a lot of reading.
  • You have to read every other day, and write kinds of reflections about what you read.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • If you want a better grade, you have to write siding with her beliefs.
  • You have to have similar views in order to get .
  • She gives 4 essays in the semester.

Theme 3

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Anderson is a and wants you to do good in her class
  • Her class was very interesting. I loved the novels she made us read.
  • She openly ridiculed a student in front of the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four reviews across 2018-2019 are detailed and consistent about workload, but opinions on teaching are mixed.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1002 reviews
ENG1051 review
ENG1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values