AI Rate Professor

Languages

Karen Reed

SPE120 · INTER120 · COMM100 · SPCHSECT · SPCHINTCOMM · SPEECH120 · SPEECH · SPEEC100 · SPECH100 · SPCH100 · SP100 · COMM130 · SPCH120 · COMM110 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid Reed unless , and a class that may require self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear assignmentsPersonal-life tangentsHarsh subjective gradingMandatory attendancePolarizing personality
  • Most recent reviews are strongly negative, describing unclear teaching, personal tangents, rude communication, and poor organization.
  • Students repeatedly say grades feel subjective, grammar-heavy, or based on a small number of tests and assignments.
  • A minority found the class easy or supportive, but the dominant pattern is high frustration and low recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades, but many say grades depend , and staying on her good side.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The communication material itself is not described as conceptually hard, but and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews repeatedly say attendance matters, she gets upset about absences, and students must show up on time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The dominant recommendation is negative because students report , and wasted class time.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

as subjective, nitpicky, grammar-heavy, unclear, or based on very few items.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes speeches, notes, tests, papers, outlines, and participation, but the .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments criticize her for personal tangents, unclear directions, disorganization, missed classes, and rude or judgmental behavior.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Several COMM110 reviews say one midterm or speech-based course format.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a highly polarizing class, with , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Students most often complain that she does not clearly teach or grade according to transparent expectations.

What students said

“She doesn't actually teach anything.”
COMM110
“She grades based on her opinion rather than the actual quality of work.”
COMM130
“The class was based on a test, not the speeches.”
COMM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews say tests or a midterm can heavily determine the grade, but they .

Midterm HeavyFew Graded ItemsNote-Based TestsStrict Grammar Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

pattern in some classes, but they do not clearly prove the book policy or proctoring format.

Midterm HeavyFew Graded ItemsNote-Based TestsStrict Grammar Grading
“Your grade is entire based off 1 mid term that she barely covers in lecture”
COMM110
“The class was based on a test, not the speeches.”
COMM110
“ .”
COMM130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She grades based on her opinion rather than the actual quality of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She doesn't actually teach anything.”

⚖️

18/100

“She grades based on her opinion rather than the actual quality of work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“If !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She only cared about talking about herself and her own personal problems.
  • She doesn't teach at all and spends a lot of time talking about her personal life.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Tests

  • The class was based on a test, not the speeches.
  • She likes to mark off for minor grammatical errors.
  • She looks for any reason to lower your grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • She missed 5 classes, & never warned us she wont be in.
  • She sends very rude and unprofessional emails to students.
  • but never with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 in-person reviews across many years with repeated, , and organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 57
3 out of 510
2 out of 59
1 out of 519

Course coverage

COMM13013 reviews
SPCH12011 reviews
COMM1109 reviews
SPCH1006 reviews
SPEECH2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
COMM1001 review
INTER1201 review
SP1001 review
SPCHINTCOMM1 review
SPCHSECT1 review
SPE1201 review
SPECH1001 review
SPEEC1001 review
SPEECH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2