AI Rate Professor

Communication

Karen Reed

COMM130 · COMM110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and a frustrating classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderPoor Lecture StructureTest HeavyLow RecommendationLimited Feedback
  • Most students describe harsh grading and .
  • Several reviews say class time is slow or unfocused, with important material rushed late.
  • , but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and tests that do not match lectures well.

The online review mentions grade damage from the final, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The material itself sounds manageable, but poor pacing and it should.

The , while in-person reviews focus on slow lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because tags and comments warn that skipping class makes passing unlikely.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students explicitly advise avoiding her because of , and negative classroom experience.

Both formats are negative, with stronger and more repeated avoidance warnings in in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple students call her a and say effort may not feel rewarded.

Format shift

evidence in in-person COMM130 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not fully quantified, but reviews mention reading, homework, dictations, and .

Format shift

Workload ; the online review focuses more on the .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students often describe her lectures as slow, unfocused, emotionally uncomfortable, or unhelpful for tests.

Format shift

The online review describes personal-life distractions, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize midterms, tests, and a and dictations playing a secondary role.

Format shift

The online review mentions a , while , and dictation assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews , and low recommendation.

Main concern

Students say and lectures do not prepare them well for tests.

What students said

“If you have the .”
COMM130
“ and .”
COMM130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review describes a very frustrating class with and a low grade outcome.

Main concern

The and hurt the student's grade.

What students said

“The in the last couple weeks, and my grade suffered.”
COMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests and midterms as important and hard, but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Final TestMidterms Based On NotesTest HeavyHard Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Midterms Based On NotesTest HeavyHard Grading
“For midterms, some of the questions are based on notes, so !!!”
COMM130
“her lectures are not equal to her tests, which are extremel hard bc she grades very hard”
COMM130

Online

The online review only clearly supports a and does not prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Final TestRushed Late Material
“The in the last couple weeks, and my grade suffered.”
COMM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She drags on the class forever, lectures at a super slow rate and takes forever to get to the material.”

⚖️

15/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“ . Reed at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The whole class would have to hear her talk about her personal life, including some things that I could have lived without knowing.
  • She drags on the class forever, lectures at a super slow rate and takes forever to get to the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No matter what you do, it will never be enough for her.
  • and .
  • The in the last couple weeks, and my grade suffered.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and , but the sample is small and somewhat old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMM1304 reviews
COMM1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values