AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Sandra Raeber

ACCT145 · QUICKBOOKS · ACTG144145 · ACTG145 · ACTG100 · ACCT100 · ACT100 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulEasy A PotentialExtra CreditHomework HeavyClear Assignments
  • Most students describe her as helpful, nice, and knowledgeable.
  • Grades can be easy with consistent work, , and .
  • A recurring concern is mandatory or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students call the class an easy A, but the A and staying current.

Online evidence is self-paced and help-based, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is manageable with guidance, but accounting and QuickBooks chapters can become difficult without steady practice.

The online review emphasizes self-checking work, while in-person reviews describe clearer guidance but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and attendance are main requirements, while online evidence does not show attendance rules.

; the single online review does not establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students generally recommend her because , and .

Both formats are positive, but higher review count.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and easy-A comments suggest leniency, though some older reviews complain about strict thresholds and .

Format shift

Online evidence is limited, while and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The course can feel easy if paced well, but several students describe lots of .

Format shift

Online work is self-guided through the book, while .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most students describe her as , and knowledgeable despite some boring lecture complaints.

Format shift

Online evidence praises accessibility, while and some lecture concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews emphasize homework, chapter work, labs, assignments, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based work, especially the online self-checking format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, praising help and clarity while and occasional boring lectures.

Main concern

and time-consuming.

What students said

“provides plenty of .”
ACTG100
“Too Much HW!!”
ACT100
“This is a low-stress class where you learn QuickBooks.”
ACTG145

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the class is book-guided and self-checked, with the .

Main concern

Some QuickBooks chapters may .

What students said

“The class itself is to follow the book and self-check your answers before submitting them”
ACTG145
“she was always happy to assist.”
ACTG145

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, but , and book policy are not clearly proven beyond one in-person cheat sheet comment.

QuizzesTestsCheat Sheet AllowedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one allowed cheat sheet, but do not clearly prove broader exam rules.

TestsQuizzesCheat Sheet Allowed
“A cheat sheet is allowed but you'll end up writing really small on it since its a 3x5 card.”
ACCT100
“ and it will affect your overall grade”
ACT100
“PowerPoint slides which are great for referring and quizzes.”
ACTG100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz format, exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do all the work and you'll get an "A".”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ assistance in understanding the material”

📈 Grade Potential

82/100

“These are easy As, assuming you dont wait until 2 days before the end of the semester to do all of the assignments”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“Too Much HW!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • assistance in understanding the material
  • .
  • Teacher refuses to help with end-of-chapter assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • These are easy As, assuming you dont wait until 2 days before the end of the semester to do all of the assignments
  • provides plenty of .
  • Do all the work and you'll get an "A".

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Too Much HW!!
  • you must do all hws to pass class and they are only worth 15% of grade
  • The class itself is to follow the book and self-check your answers before submitting them

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though only one review is online.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 57
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT1004 reviews
ACTG1003 reviews
ACTG1441453 reviews
ACTG1453 reviews
QUICKBOOKS3 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ACCT1451 review
ACT1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values