AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Juleh S McLintock

CHEM220 · CHEM192 · CHEM410 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can learn chemistry independently and mainly need a manageable path through the course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind But ConfusingWeak ExplanationsSelf-Study NeededDisorganized LecturesHomework Matters
  • Students often describe her as kind and approachable but weak at explaining chemistry.
  • The course is not beginner friendly because several reviews say students must teach themselves.
  • Grades may be reachable with homework and , but the learning experience is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A seems possible with homework and , but students say success requires independent work and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

33/100

The chemistry content is hard mainly because and beginners receive limited guidance.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe the course as .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

, while another warns skipping class can hurt passing.

and is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because and organization are recurring problems.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and homework help, but reviews .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention homework and self-study as important, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students often call her nice, but most .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

One review tags the class as test heavy, while as preparation support.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but often unclear, unorganized, and not strong for beginners.

Main concern

Students may need to learn much of the material on their own.

What students said

“She does not understand the material deeply and gets so .”
CHEM192
“Nice person, but not for the novice.”
CHEM410
“U need 2 learn the material on ur on 2 really understand it.”
CHEM220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and a textbook access issue near finals, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Test HeavyFinal Exam Week Textbook Issue

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or webcam rules.

Test HeavyFinal Exam Week Textbook Issue
“TEST HEAVY”
CHEM192
“make the and no one could study”
CHEM192

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but doesn't convey the material well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and recommendation strength; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“She does not understand the material deeply and gets so .”

📚

42/100

“U need 2 learn the material on ur on 2 really understand it.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“Nice person, but not for the novice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not understand the material deeply and gets so .
  • she doesn't really teach, just reads the PowerPoint.
  • doesn't convey the material well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You really have to do all the though.
  • TEST HEAVY

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's a kind person.
  • and nice!
  • she's a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited by only four reviews spread across many years, though the core concerns are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM4102 reviews
CHEM1921 review
CHEM2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values