AI Rate Professor

English

Orellana Johnson

ENG838 · IDST110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Consider Johnson only if you are comfortable with a polarized classroom experience and and workload inconsistency.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly polarized reviewsEasy for some studentsTough grading concernsHomework concernsPersonality-dependent fit
  • Student opinion is sharply split, with two excellent reviews and two extremely negative reviews.
  • Some students say she is fun, dedicated, and easy to pass, while others call the experience horrible.
  • grades easily and another saying she grades tough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A+ and says she grades easily, but another earned an F and a review calls her a .

, and those reviews conflict sharply.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course seems easy for students who fit her style, but homework and failing outcomes show it is not reliably easy.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is tagged, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split evenly between enthusiastic praise and strong avoidance.

All and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

she grades easily and another calling her a .

Format shift

, and they conflict.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

One negative review tags lots of homework, while positive reviews do not describe the workload as light.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Reviews are polarized between dedicated, fun teaching and extremely negative overall experiences.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments mention grading, participation, , and homework, but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

easy grading and dedication and harsh criticism of the overall experience.

Main concern

Student experience appears inconsistent, with and .

What students said

“She grades really easily.”
IDST110
“Straight up person who grades tough.”
ENG838
“The most horrible professor I ever had”
IDST110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Straight up person who grades tough. Gets along with students and makes learning fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and student fit; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“She is dedicated to her job.”

⚖️

50/100

“Straight up person who grades tough.”

👍 Recommendation Divide

50/100

“The most horrible professor I ever had”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great professor and most of the people who rated who had were most likely the annoying high schoolers in her class.
  • Gets along with students and makes learning fun.
  • The most horrible professor I ever had

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades really easily.
  • Straight up person who grades tough.
  • Horrible

Theme 3

🧭 About Fit

  • If your not annoying or a smart ass, youll do fine.
  • She gets along really well with all the students other than the annoying ones

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews provide some signal, but the comments are short and sharply inconsistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

IDST1103 reviews
ENG8381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1