AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Yin Mei Lawrence

CHEM232 · OCHEM232 · CHEM232231 · CHEMISTRY210 · CHEM231232 · CHEM231 · CHEM410 · CHEM210 · CHEM · OCHEM231 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle a blunt personality and will , and office hours.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGenerous Extra CreditClear ResourcesMoody PersonalityTough But Fair ExamsCaring When Students Try
  • Many students praise her organization, resources, , and ability to make chemistry understandable.
  • Experiences vary sharply because some students find her blunt, moody, or personally discouraging.
  • Grades can be very achievable when students attend, practice, and use her study materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very reachable because many students , and , but it still requires steady practice.

Online evidence is negative and test-focused, while effort and resources.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Chemistry and organic chemistry content can be challenging, but her resources and .

The online review says the course was unclear, while as manageable when students keep up.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, though at least one in-person review says it is not mandatory.

In-person reviews mention attendance expectations, while the lone online review .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for strong preparation and , but the personality complaints keep the recommendation from being universal.

The , while the but mostly favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and fair test preparation, despite a few strict-grading complaints.

Format shift

The online review complains about unclear exams, while in-person .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Students report lots of homework, quizzes, labs, and practice, but much of and sometimes earns .

Format shift

In-person evidence shows steady work, while the online .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

She is often described as , and resource-rich, but some students find her rude, moody, or hard to learn from.

Format shift

The online review is poor, while but generally positive teaching record.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to combine quizzes, homework, labs, midterms, finals, mock exams, and rather than relying on one method only.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes exams and pop quizzes, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but mostly say she provides strong resources, fair preparation, , and help for students who work.

Main concern

Her blunt or moody style can make some students feel targeted or unsupported.

What students said

“Free A if you just listen to her in class, study off her powerpoints for and do the assigments.”
CHEM410
“She gives everything you need to learn, its up to you to practice!”
CHEM231
“Makes you feel like you're not smart enough to be in o-chem.”
CHEM231

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and and included material students had not learned.

Main concern

and course organization are the main concern.

What students said

“ , and this class was not worth it in my opinion.”
CHEM410
“She put things on an ”
CHEM410

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

study guides, mock exams, and practice often preparing students well.

Tests And QuizzesMock ExamsStudy GuidesSome Tough ExamsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe quizzes, midterms, finals, mock exams, and study guides, with policy.

Tests And QuizzesMock ExamsStudy GuidesMidtermsFinal
“ .”
CHEM410
“ but fair, no surprise questions.”
CHEM231
“use the study . It prepares well for test.”
CHEM410

Online

The and included material students had not learned, but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Unclear TestsTests Are ToughPop QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“ ”
CHEM410
“She put things on an ”
CHEM410

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives everything you need to learn, its up to you to practice!”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and personality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She gives everything you need to learn, its up to you to practice!”

📈 Grade Value

80/100

“Free A if you just listen to her in class, study off her powerpoints for and do the assigments.”

⚖️

78/100

“ and tries to involve all the students!”

⚠️ Personality Risk

45/100

“Makes you feel like you're not smart enough to be in o-chem.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She explains organic chemistry REALLY well even though it is a hard concept.
  • Hard to learn from. and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The !
  • You need to work hard to get an A in this class.
  • Lots of extra credits.
  • was 91% and I only had 90%.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Prep

  • but fair, no surprise questions.
  • There will be no surprises on the the homework
  • , and this class was not worth it in my opinion.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • This teacher cares about her students.
  • She can be a little abrasive at times.
  • She's happy to answer any questions you have and help you if you're struggling.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 40 reviews span many years and show repeated themes across both praise and criticism.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM23117 reviews
CHEM4107 reviews
CHEM2104 reviews
CHEM2324 reviews
CHEM2312322 reviews
Show 5 more courses
OCHEM2322 reviews
CHEM1 review
CHEM2322311 review
CHEMISTRY2101 review
OCHEM2311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values