AI Rate Professor

English

Greg Lance

CSM123 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you value independence and can handle uneven teaching, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentParticipation mattersHeavy reading and homeworkIndependent learningMixed classroom tone
  • praise and one serious concern about inconsistent behavior.
  • The online review is and low reward.
  • Grades look attainable in person, but the workload and teaching consistency vary sharply by format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

In-person students reported A and A+ grades, but the online F and effortless.

The A , while the online review reports failure and low reward.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course includes advanced topics, reading, participation, and analysis that can feel demanding despite some students finding it manageable.

, while in-person evidence is mixed between easy and difficult experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears often, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats mention participation, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students either strongly praise him or warn about heavy work and uncomfortable moments, making the recommendation highly conditional.

but split, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but the online F and heavy-work complaint prevent calling it lenient.

Format shift

, while the online review suggests harsh effort-to-grade payoff.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple tags and the online comment , and papers.

Format shift

The online review is clearly heavy, and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Two in-person students call him great, but and the online review is frustrated.

Format shift

, while online feedback focuses on workload frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework, reading, papers, packets, participation, and analysis, with .

Format shift

Both formats provide assignment-based evidence, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

serious complaint about discomfort and disengagement.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent classroom behavior and structure.

What students said

“Mr.Lance is an AWESOME teacher!”
CSM123
“From time to time he would throw tantrums and make people extremely uncomfortable”
CSM123
“Great teacher! Other review is WRONG!”
CSM123

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review describes high workload, low reward, and very difficult analysis-heavy work.

Main concern

and unrewarding.

What students said

“So , so little reward and EVERYTHING is analized like we are solving the DaVinchi code”
CSM123

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book status, quiz format, midterms, or finals.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So , so little reward and EVERYTHING is analized like we are solving the DaVinchi code”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Mr.Lance is an AWESOME teacher!”

⚖️ Workload Payoff

28/100

“So , so little reward and EVERYTHING is analized like we are solving the DaVinchi code”

👍 Recommendation Risk

55/100

“From time to time he would throw tantrums and make people extremely uncomfortable”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr.Lance is an AWESOME teacher!
  • Great teacher! Other review is WRONG!
  • cool guy, should not be teaching highschoolers.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • So , so little reward and EVERYTHING is analized like we are solving the DaVinchi code
  • eventually, just gave us packets and didnt care.

Theme 3

🤝 About Classroom Feel

  • he gave us independence, and for the most part treated us like adults.
  • From time to time he would throw tantrums and make people extremely uncomfortable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews give some signal, but the evidence is split, one review is old, and several comments are very brief.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSM1234 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values