AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Albert Wong

ENGR210 · ENGR100 · ENGR215 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself, use outside resources, and handle heavy, nitpicky engineering work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots Of HomeworkTough GraderPoor ExplanationsOutside Help NeededNitpicky Grading
  • Comments are sharply split, but , and a need for outside help.
  • and an A was easy if students kept up, but other reviews say the class is not easy and requires major work.
  • All evidence is from in-person engineering reviews, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

One student calls it an easy A if you keep up, but most comments , and major outside effort.

All Easy A , and there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because weak, and students need outside resources.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass, even though .

and comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students would not recommend him because , and reliance on outside help.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Several reviews call him a tough grader or nitpicky, and students say .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and work that takes a long time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments describe him as a nice or knowledgeable person but a and forces self-teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a final rather than relying on only one type of work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews report heavy homework and , and a strong need for outside help.

Main concern

Students often say they learned from friends or outside sources instead of lectures.

What students said

“Everything I know I learned from outside sources or friends that have CAD and design experience.”
ENGR210
“You need a lot of outside sources.”
ENGR210
“ as much as possible.”
ENGR100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

practice and tests containing poorly explained material.

Practice SimilarityTestsFinalUnclear Exam Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Practice SimilarityTestsFinalUnclear Exam Coverage
“The exams and and pretty straightforward.”
ENGR210
“So bad at explaining what will be on the test.”
ENGR100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall nice guy bad teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Have been to every lecture and can't say I have learned from him.”

📚 Workload Load

18/100

“There were a lot of homeworks and but while to do it so don't do it at the last minute.”

⚖️

22/100

“He is really picky about problems and is terrible at teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesn't teach things in class.
  • Everything I know I learned from outside sources or friends that have CAD and design experience.
  • He is a good guy but a terrible teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Yes, he gives out a lot of work and is really nit picky when it comes to answers.
  • and challenging.
  • There were a lot of homeworks and lab assignments

Theme 3

📝

  • The exams and and pretty straightforward.
  • You will have to put in work to get an A.
  • He will put a question we never go over or barely go over on the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed in-person reviews show consistent patterns around workload and teaching problems, despite two positive ratings.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR2104 reviews
ENGR1001 review
ENGR2151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2