AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Linda Whitten

ACCOUNTING · ACTG131 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself accounting with limited instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Study HeavyUnclear TeachingUnresponsive CommunicationHard MaterialMixed Organization
  • Most students criticize her teaching style as .
  • Accounting material is described as difficult, and students do not report strong support.
  • One older review is positive, but the overall tone is negative and recommendation evidence is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

There is no strong easy-A evidence, and students describe hard material with limited guidance.

All authoritative reviews are counted as .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The accounting content is described as hard, especially for students who do not already enjoy the subject.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they felt instruction was unclear, poorly sequenced, or unresponsive.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

There is too little direct grading evidence, but hard material and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and grading comments are sparse.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and self-study expectations make the course feel labor-heavy despite limited detail.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Several students say lectures and review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments mainly mention homework and self-study, while .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is mostly negative, with , and homework assigned before lectures.

Main concern

Students may need to learn from the .

What students said

“I was very disappointed in this teacher and her style of teaching.”
ACTG131
“She gave us homeworks before she lecturing any chapters.”
ACCOUNTING
“Professor .”
ACTG131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was very disappointed in this teacher and her style of teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, workload structure, and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“I learned more about Rueben than I did about Managerial Accounting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“Professor .”

📚 Workload Structure

30/100

“She gave us homeworks before she lecturing any chapters.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I was very disappointed in this teacher and her style of teaching.
  • i've never had a class where the professor talked more about her personal life as a grandmother than her.
  • . I like her personality.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • The class material is pretty hard itself if you do not enjoy actg in general.
  • Professor ..
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because there are only 5 reviews, several are old, and exam and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACTG1314 reviews
ACCOUNTING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values