AI Rate Professor

Physics

Courtney Hadsell

PHYS250 · PHYS210 · PHYS260 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you can keep up independently, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear test alignmentHeavy homeworkMixed teaching qualityUnfair quiz concerns
  • and quizzes match lectures and .
  • Negative reviews say lectures can move too fast and .
  • Students need to be proactive with , and independent study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is possible, but , and difficult exams that require steady work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The physics content is manageable for some students but can feel fast-paced, equation-heavy, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though class participation appears useful for quizzes and exams.

Only in-person reviews mention classroom learning, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend her when lectures align with assessments, but and .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and varies strongly by course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades appear achievable but and unfair quizzes balancing the A reports.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention weekly homework, online homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Some students praise her clear explanations, while others say she moves too fast and .

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed, and there is no online teaching evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment includes homework, weekly quizzes, lab reports, tests, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

in PHYS260 and confusing, fast-paced experiences in PHYS210 and PHYS250.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and .

What students said

“ the most beneficial in preparing me for the exams.”
PHYS260
“ and moves too fast so you can't really do anything in the process.”
PHYS210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are usually tied to lectures or study guides, but some students say the and .

Lecture-Based TestsWeekly QuizzesStudy GuidesHard Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention lecture-based tests, weekly quizzes, study guides, and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Lecture-Based TestsWeekly QuizzesStudy GuidesHard Exams
“her tests and .”
PHYS260
“She gives out study guides that are a bad representation of the so everyone fails when the .”
PHYS210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“I think that she did really well good job explaining all the concepts in the course”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“There is a lot of , but it is manageable.”

⚠️

48/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is straight to the
  • and moves too fast so you can't really do anything in the process.
  • She'll try her best to get you to understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of , but it is manageable.
  • Be ready to write your lab reports from scratch, which is actually a good exercise.
  • because she thinks shes clever.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older but detailed reviews give useful evidence, though opinions vary by course and there are no recent reviews.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS2603 reviews
PHYS2102 reviews
PHYS2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1