AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Deborah Ebert

ESL400 · ESL847 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingHarsh Essay GradingLow GuidanceBoring ClassAvoided by Students
  • Students consistently say the class provides little useful instruction.
  • as strict and unclear.
  • Multiple students warn that earning an A is very difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students directly say an A is very hard because and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course seems difficult mainly because and students must figure out essay expectations alone.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students repeatedly warn against taking her because they feel they learn little and are graded harshly.

All and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

as , and disconnected from positive feedback.

Format shift

, and they are strongly negative.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention , and essay revisions, but the workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently describe her teaching as unhelpful, boring, and .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments , and essays rather than exams.

Format shift

and essay work only, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, citing weak teaching, boring classes, and .

Main concern

Students say they receive little useful guidance but .

What students said

“Basically she is useless.”
ESL400
“You cannot learn anything from her because you'll learn everything on your own.”
ESL400
“ if .”
ESL400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the open-book or closed-book.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You cannot learn anything from her because you'll learn everything on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She didn't know how to teach.”

⚖️

8/100

“ , but you'll never get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Basically she is useless.
  • It's boring!
  • You cannot learn anything from her because you'll learn everything on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was very strict with though you make many appointments with and make changes in your article.
  • if you want get an A in this class, go find another professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are consistent and detailed enough to show a , but they are old and mostly from one course.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL4005 reviews
ESL8471 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values