AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Patti Appel-Anderson

GRAPHIC · DGME230 · MULTI161 · GRA120 · GRA160 · DGME211 · GRA110 · DGME212 · PHOTOSECT · GRA161 · GRA120121 · GRA250 · PHOTOSHOP · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you want a , but expect and occasional pacing issues.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient and CaringHelpful With SoftwareUneven ClarityTime-Consuming Assignments
  • Most positive reviews praise her patience, kindness, and practical Photoshop help.
  • Negative reviews focus on unclear handouts, rushed lectures, and .
  • The experience looks strongest for beginners who actively ask for help in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

Getting an A seems realistic with persistence and help, but unclear materials and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The software content is approachable for beginners when she gives help, but and rushed lectures add friction.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Students often recommend her for patience and useful software help, though .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades seem attainable, including an A from a beginner, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

Workload appears manageable for many students but at .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

She is often described as patient, caring, helpful, and knowledgeable, but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and software practice more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but lean positive, with many students praising her patience and help while and rushed pacing.

Main concern

Some students and waited a long time for help.

What students said

“She took so much time with me I reconsidered, stuck it out and got an A.”
DGME211
“Rushes through course material, gets impatient with slower students/questions during her lengthy lectures.”
DGME230
“I really enjoyed her class and appreciated her enthusiasm and patience.”
DGME212

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She took so much time with me I reconsidered, stuck it out and got an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, clarity, workload, and support; credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

76/100

“I really enjoyed her class and appreciated her enthusiasm and patience.”

Recommendation Level

73/100

“ .”

Workload Pressure

54/100

“ life.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher with immense amount of knowledge to pass onto her students.
  • She is amazing, wonderful, knowledgable and gorgeous.
  • uses class and positive.

Theme 2

Clarity and Pacing

  • Rushes through course material, gets impatient with slower students/questions during her lengthy lectures.
  • Some of the and still not updated.
  • her wording gets me lost.

Theme 3

Support and Outcomes

  • She took so much time with me I reconsidered, stuck it out and got an A.
  • and kind.
  • I now make my living with Photoshop.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews over many years with consistent themes, but several are old or vague.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DGME2113 reviews
GRA1603 reviews
GRA1202 reviews
DGME2121 review
DGME2301 review
Show 8 more courses
GRA1101 review
GRA1201211 review
GRA1611 review
GRA2501 review
GRAPHIC1 review
MULTI1611 review
PHOTOSECT1 review
PHOTOSHOP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1