AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Edwin Seubert

DGME103 · DESIGNGRAPHIC · GRA115 · ART111 · GRA100101 · DGME220103 · GRA100 · GRAPHICDESIGN · 2DIMENSIONAL · ILLUSTRATOR · DGME211 · ALLHISCLASSES · EVERYCLASS · GRAPHICS · ALL · TYPOGRAPHY · DGME220 · GRAPHICCLASSES · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can handle a and are willing to rely heavily on your own judgment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly PolarizingHarshly CriticizedDesign Relevance ConcernsHelpful to SomeHeavy Frustration
  • Reviews are sharply polarized, but the negative comments are frequent and intense.
  • Many students question his teaching value, design relevance, qualifications, and .
  • A minority of students praise him as systematic, experienced, passionate, and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The high difficulty ratings and complaints about bad grades make an A look costly and uncertain despite a few easy-class comments.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course experience appears difficult mainly because of , and disputed teaching value rather than advanced content alone.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though some suggest participation and asking questions affect outcomes.

, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The dominant recent tone is strongly negative, with .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students report bad grades tied to not asking for help and as punishing or unfair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Difficulty ratings are high and several reviews describe the classes as stressful, depressing, or .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise his clarity and experience, but many more describe him as .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Comments center , and portfolio relevance rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

warnings and a smaller group of strong supporters.

Main concern

Many students describe poor teaching value, outdated design direction, and frustrating interactions.

What students said

“No no no. Don't make the same mistake i did.”
ALL
“Crappy! If you have to pay for .”
DGME103
“He is systematic and and experienced.”
GRA115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No no no. Don't make the same mistake i did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in , and support; credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

38/100

“don't know what he doing!”

Recommendation Level

28/100

“ if you can.”

Mixed Support

45/100

“He is systematic and and experienced.”

Theme 1

Warnings and Frustration

  • No good at all.
  • HE IS MY NIGHTMARE. .
  • Both him and his classes are depressing.

Theme 2

Teaching Value Concerns

  • This class is a joke, waste of time, minimal learning, .
  • Scared to death that I'm going to leave CSM with the ability to design only mid-late 1990's graphics.
  • This guy has no qualifications to teach.

Theme 3

Positive Minority View

  • Great teacher, he really has a passion for his job and gives great .
  • Ed's a wonderful, meticulous teacher.
  • Fantastic teacher--so inspired I took all of his classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

There are 26 reviews across many years with strong patterns, but the tone is polarized and several comments are vague or emotionally extreme.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 58
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ALL3 reviews
DGME1033 reviews
DGME2202 reviews
DGME2201032 reviews
GRAPHICDESIGN2 reviews
Show 13 more courses
TYPOGRAPHY2 reviews
2DIMENSIONAL1 review
ALLHISCLASSES1 review
ART1111 review
DESIGNGRAPHIC1 review
DGME2111 review
EVERYCLASS1 review
GRA1001 review
GRA1001011 review
GRA1151 review
GRAPHICCLASSES1 review
GRAPHICS1 review
ILLUSTRATOR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values