AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Laarni Von Ruden

ACTG165 · ACTG164 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you are willing to attend consistently and study, because the reward appears fair but not effortless.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized and ApproachableAnimated PresenterExam Effort RequiredExtra Credit HelpsMixed Preparation
  • Most reviews describe her as , and helpful.
  • Students can do well by , and studying for exams.
  • One negative review says lectures felt unprepared and confusing, so confidence is limited by the small sample.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

A grades are realistic with , and studying, and can soften harder midterms.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The accounting content and midterms are not easy, but and .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as important for doing well, but reviews do not .

, and they suggest attendance matters.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps prepared students succeed.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and two reported A grades suggest forgiving outcomes, though exams still require study.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and but is described as manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

Most reviews praise her organization, presentation skills, and approachability, though one review says she winged lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams, suggesting a balanced but exam-relevant structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and presentation, while one review strongly criticizes lecture preparation and value.

Main concern

and one student felt the .

What students said

“ .”
ACTG164
“If you attend the class all the , and study for the exams you will do great!”
ACTG165
“I think all the .”
ACTG164

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while helps students improve grades.

Midterms Not EasyExtra Credit Available

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, or .

Midterms Not EasyExtra Credit Available
“The but she offers to help you get a better grade.”
ACTG164
“study for the !”
ACTG165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you attend the class all the , and study for the exams you will do great!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting , and concerns; credibility rating: Low.

Teaching Quality

75/100

“Prof. Von Ruden has great presentation skills - very animated.”

Grade Path

70/100

“If you attend the class all the , and study for the exams you will do great!”

55/100

“The but she offers to help you get a better grade.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Prof. Von Ruden has great presentation skills - very animated.
  • Prof. Laarni is an and easy to talk to.

Theme 2

Grades and Exams

  • The but she offers to help you get a better grade.
  • study for the !

Theme 3

Concerns

  • She tries to wing it in class without preparing her lectures.
  • I think all the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 in-person reviews are available, including one duplicate and one strong outlier, so confidence is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACTG1642 reviews
ACTG1652 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values