AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jan Tarski

MATH · MATH200 · STATSSECT · STATISTICS200 · MATH120 · STAT · STATS200 · MATH110 · STATISTICS · MATTH200 · STATS · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take Jan Tarski only if you can teach yourself math from notes, the book, and outside help.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandVery NiceOpen NotesLenient GradingSelf-Study Needed
  • Students and willing to help but very hard to understand.
  • Grades and because .
  • and leave confused.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Despite weak teaching clarity, open-note quizzes and easy to pass or ace for self-directed students.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Math and statistics content can feel confusing because and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and participation, but some reviews say students do not have to stay the whole class or only show up for tests.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

lectures and learn independently while benefiting from lenient testing.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Many reviews mention , and forgiving grading despite poor lecture clarity.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

as reasonable or optional, and the grade structure seems forgiving for students who take notes and quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students repeatedly say he , and though many also describe him as kind and helpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize frequent quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

many students dislike the , while others value his kindness and .

Main concern

The main risk is not understanding lectures well enough to learn the material.

What students said

“his lessons were so unclear.”
MATH110
“Every second week there is a test but it is open notes!”
MATH120
“easy A, but unnecessary to do.”
MATH200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The overall exam style is student-friendly because and tests.

Open NotesOpen Book QuizzesSimilar Quizzes And TestsFrequent Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and open-book quiz or test formats, though exact policies may vary by course.

Open NotesOpen Book QuizzesSimilar Quizzes And Tests
“Every second week there is a test but it is open notes!”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH110
“The quizes are open book and you are allowed to use hand written notes.”
STATS200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice person but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“HE knows what he's talking about but the STUDENTS don't understand at all.”

⚖️

80/100

“If you show an interest in his class, he will be very lenient with you in terms of .”

📝

86/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lessons were so unclear.
  • you ALWAYS !
  • a problem on the board in small writing and then moves on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A, but unnecessary to do.
  • Anyone can pass this class (because he lets you have full notes and )
  • i hate math and i got an A in stats.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is such a sweet guy!
  • .
  • and open minded about it, and ended up changing it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one reviews across many years , and lenient testing, despite some vague entries.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH20020 reviews
MATH1209 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
2001 review
Show 7 more courses
MATH1 review
MATTH2001 review
STAT1 review
STATISTICS2001 review
STATS1 review
STATS2001 review
STATSSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1