AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Bob Johnson

PHIL300 · PHI300 · RELIG300 · PHIL130 · PHILO300 · PHIL100 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can handle long lecture-based classes and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardRambling lecturesBoring but knowledgeableTest-heavy gradingDiscussion helpsMixed recommendations
  • Student opinion is sharply split between those who find him engaging and and boring.
  • , so success depends on notes, attendance, and studying guides when provided.
  • The class can be easy for attentive students but frustrating for students who need structured lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible with strong notes and studying, but many students say .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

The content is not always conceptually brutal, but rambling lectures and simple intro class.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

43/100

because , though reviews do not clearly prove a strict policy in every class.

and note taking, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

Students are split because some love his knowledge and discussion style while others say he rambles and does not teach clearly.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

but unforgiving because grades often depend on a few multiple-choice tests and note quality.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Workload is light because students repeatedly mention little homework and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is mixed because he is knowledgeable and kind but often described as rambling, boring, and unclear.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

91/100

Assessment is heavily exam-focused, with several reviews saying the grade is based on three or four multiple-choice tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

his knowledge and friendliness while others criticize rambling lectures and .

Main concern

Lectures can be boring, off topic, and .

What students said

“lectures are beyond boring and study guides have nothing to do with his tests.”
PHIL300
“Grade based off of three, 25 question multiple choice tests.”
PHIL100
“ and funny professor.”
PHIL300
“Overall, easy to pass, hard to get an A in this class.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is test-heavy with multiple-choice exams, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Multiple-Choice TestsTest-Heavy GradeStudy Guides Sometimes UsedNotes Matter

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and heavy reliance on lecture notes, with mixed reports on test difficulty and study-guide usefulness.

Multiple-Choice TestsThree Or Four TestsStudy Guides Sometimes UsedNotes Matter
“Grade based off of three, 25 question multiple choice tests.”
PHIL100
“grades based on 4 multiple choice tests.”
PHIL300
“Hands and answers all questions”
PHIL100
“4 tests worth 25 points each. that is your grade.”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, easy to pass, hard to get an A in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This guy is very knowledgeable but he rambles and drones on.”

📝

91/100

“grades based on 4 multiple choice tests.”

👍 Recommendation Split

53/100

“ and funny professor.”

📈 Grade Effort

56/100

“Overall, easy to pass, hard to get an A in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't teach. He just talks to you.
  • and funny professor.
  • He walks in, talk about whatever he feels like.
  • This guy is very knowledgeable but he rambles and drones on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grade based off of three, 25 question multiple choice tests.
  • Overall, easy to pass, hard to get an A in this class.
  • and multiple choice.
  • His class is really boring and the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , but extremely boring.
  • .
  • He truly loves his students and his subject and engages in lively and stimulating conversations with his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 27 in-person reviews across many years with detailed and repeated themes, despite strong disagreement in tone.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL30016 reviews
PHIL1007 reviews
PHI3001 review
PHIL1301 review
PHILO3001 review
Show 1 more courses
RELIG3001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1