AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Tracy Deville

NURSING · NURS232 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a clear, engaging nursing instructor and are willing to keep pace with lectures and review sessions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsThorough LecturesHelpful Test ReviewsFast PacedEngaged Teacher
  • Students strongly praise Deville for , and engaged teaching.
  • Exams are manageable, especially when students attend the review session.
  • The class is fast paced, but the structure and support make it feel fair.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A appears very reachable because exams are not too difficult when students attend the review session and follow the slides.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is fast paced, but , and review sessions keep it manageable.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

as mandatory, but the .

; there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and prepares students well for exams.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

The reported A and comments that exams are not too difficult suggest favorable but .

Format shift

and grades.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as heavy, but fast-paced lectures require steady attention.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Both reviews praise her as , and entertaining.

Format shift

reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The , lectures, and slides.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, and they focus on exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, thorough lectures, and .

Main concern

Lectures are fast paced, so students need to stay focused.

What students said

“Tracy's lecture is very thorough and provides slides as a guideline.”
NURS232
“ .”
NURSING
“Her lectures are fast paced and entertaining”
NURS232

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as manageable, especially with the review session, but reviews .

Test Review Before ExamsNot Too Difficult ExamsSlides as Guideline

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams are not too difficult, but they do not clearly prove book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Test Review Before ExamsNot Too Difficult ExamsSlides as Guideline
“She provides a .”
NURS232
“ if you attend the review session.”
NURS232

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great and very engaged teacher. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and pacing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Great and very engaged teacher. .”

📝

78/100

“ if you attend the review session.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“Tracy's lecture is very thorough and provides slides as a guideline.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tracy's lecture is very thorough and provides slides as a guideline.
  • Great and very engaged teacher.
  • .

Theme 2

📈

  • She provides a .
  • if you attend the review session.
  • Her lectures are fast paced and entertaining

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

The two reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample is small and old.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS2321 review
NURSING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values