AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Charles Pierpoint

ADMJ106 · ADMJ104 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if , and are comfortable with lecture-based exams that may vary in difficulty.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting lecturesNo homeworkFast pacingClass notes matterUnpredictable final
  • Students generally find the class interesting and discussion-based.
  • There , but lectures and notes matter because study guides may be absent.
  • easy tests and another warning about a bad final.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A seems possible with attendance and strong notes, but A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

53/100

The class is interesting and , but fast coverage and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

as mandatory, but students say notes from class are important for tests.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most comments are positive about his personality and interesting lectures, though one student strongly disliked the final.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Tests can be fairly easy with class notes, but as unexpectedly difficult and off-expectation.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Reviews explicitly say there is no homework or class work, making the workload light outside studying for exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe him as interesting, helpful, and discussion-oriented, though sometimes slow or fast in delivery.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

With depend mainly on tests and lecture notes.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an interesting lecture class with , and some risk from fast pacing or .

Main concern

The main risk is that exams may test material students did not expect.

What students said

“ if you go to class and because he doesn't give you a study guide.”
ADMJ106
“ .”
ADMJ104
“ as hard but ”
ADMJ104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because , but reviews do not prove a consistently student-friendly format.

No study guideClass notes neededMidterm easier than finalFinal may be difficult

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention lecture-note-based tests, no study guide, and a .

No study guideClass notes neededDifficult finalFairly easy tests
“ if you go to class and because he doesn't give you a study guide.”
ADMJ106
“ as hard but on vehicle violations but the whole final was based on all vehicle violations!”
ADMJ104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you go to class and because he doesn't give you a study guide.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“His lectures are a bit slow-paced, but very interesting and full of examples.”

📚 Workload

82/100

“ .”

📝

55/100

“ as hard but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a great guy.
  • His lectures are a bit slow-paced, but very interesting and full of examples.
  • He involves the class by asking questions and starts discussions.

Theme 2

📈

  • if you go to class and
  • he doesn't give you a study guide.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • He uses the CA Penal Code book but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 in-person reviews are available, so patterns are useful but limited and sensitive to individual course differences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMJ1042 reviews
ADMJ1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values