AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Kathryn O'Connell

PLSC130 · POLISCIE · POLISCI201 · POLISCI · POLSCI210 · POLYSCI · INTLRELS · POLYSCI3 · POLI210 · PLSC200 · POLYS130 · PLSC210 · POLI310 · PLS134 · POLISCI210 · POLISCI130 · PSC210 · PLSC310 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely hard examsPoor teaching clarityStrict attendance rulesRude classroom climateAvoid if possible
  • Most students describe the teaching experience as , and hostile.
  • as hard, vague, and poorly aligned with lectures or readings.
  • Attendance and classroom rules are described as strict without adding learning value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students repeatedly report low grades, no As, vague exams, and heavy study that still does not translate into high scores.

All counted evidence is in-person, even when some comments mention web-based course elements.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The content may be standard political science, but and unpredictable exams make the course feel extremely difficult.

All authoritative reviews are counted as .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

4/100

Students repeatedly describe strict attendance, lateness, seating, and bathroom rules that .

, and it is consistently strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly because of , and poor treatment of students.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

6/100

Reviews repeatedly mention no As, , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Some classes have few assignments, but the reading and because tests are vague and difficult.

Format shift

but .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students consistently describe lectures as , and ineffective.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

Grades , and multiple-choice exams, with few meaningful assignments mentioned.

Format shift

as the central assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing unclear , and poor student support.

Main concern

Students report , and a harsh classroom environment.

What students said

“An absolute embarrassment to the teaching profession!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
PLSC210
“ her tedious lectures nor in the book.”
PLSC130
“If you actually want to !!!!she is the !”
POLISCI210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard, vague, and poorly aligned with class materials, while reviews .

Hard ExamsVague QuestionsMultiple Choice ExamsMidterm And FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

with vague questions and little reliable preparation guidance.

Multiple Choice MidtermFinal ExamVague Exam QuestionsNo Reviews After Exams
“No way to predict .”
PLSC310
“There are NO reviews before or even after the exam.”
PLSC210
“3 exams during the semester, each covering SIX (6) chapts, 100 MC questions, to be answered in 45 min.”
PLSC210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you actually want to !!!!she is the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She is completely incompetent, yet it seems she cannot be fired.”

⚖️

6/100

“Most studts in my class are in the "D to F" range.”

🚫 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ . The professor is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Arrives late and unprepared with look on her face that seems to say "what are you idiots doing here so early?"
  • All she does is lecture and make you read the book the whooole class.
  • You don't learn anything her tests are incredibly impossible to pass even if you study and read the study guide.

Theme 2

📉

  • her tedious lectures nor in the book.
  • Absolutly horrible, I'm lucky enough to get a C on the tests and I studied hard.
  • so far not a single A in the class.

Theme 3

🚪 About Classroom Rules

  • . comes in 5-20 minutes late every class, but will not let you in if you are late.
  • She does not allow you to use bathroom during class or come in late.
  • she makes us attend even though her boring lectures are pointless!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 in-person reviews over many years with unusually consistent , and rules.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 513
1 out of 543

Course coverage

PLSC21019 reviews
PLSC2006 reviews
PLSC3104 reviews
2103 reviews
PLSC1302 reviews
Show 14 more courses
POLI3102 reviews
POLISCI2102 reviews
INTLRELS1 review
PLS1341 review
POLI2101 review
POLISCI1 review
POLISCI1301 review
POLISCI2011 review
POLISCIE1 review
POLSCI2101 review
POLYS1301 review
POLYSCI1 review
POLYSCI31 review
PSC2101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values