AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Lyle Gomes

ART360 · PHOTO01 · PHOTOGRAPH · ART365 · ART350 · PHOTO · ART351 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you care about photography and , and detailed critique.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable photographerHelpful critiqueTalks too muchWork takes timeAttendance matters
  • Students consistently say Gomes knows photography deeply and gives useful critique.
  • The course is rewarding but takes real time and attention.
  • Several students find lectures boring or overly long.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students say the , and serious effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Beginner courses are manageable, but intermediate photography is challenging and detail-focused.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students and notes are important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend him for serious photography learning, despite complaints about boring lectures.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

One student expected a B but received an A, .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students repeatedly say the class is worth it but takes time and is not for lazy students.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is knowledgeable, helpful, and passionate, but his long lectures hurt the experience for some students.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and photography work, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable, serious photography instructor whose classes reward effort but can feel lecture-heavy.

Main concern

Long, boring lectures and .

What students said

“The .”
ART351
“It's a fun and challenging class, and he's a great teacher.”
ART360
“don't regard it as a throw-away class because .”
PHOTO

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention one test and a writing assignment, but .

One TestWriting AssignmentNotes Important

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes, but do not clearly prove exam format or strictness.

One TestWriting AssignmentNotes Important
“ . One writing assgn.”
PHOTOGRAPH
“taking notes is a key to survive.”
ART351

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, and lecture style. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“he's a great teacher.”

📚 Effort Required

58/100

“don't regard it as a throw-away class because .”

⚠️ Lecture Style

45/100

“He really does tend to talk A LOT for a long time”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lyle works really hard to give you the .
  • and will help bring the best out of every photograph.
  • Excellent Instructor. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Effort

  • The .
  • If you .
  • This is an intermediate class and definitely not for the beginner.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Drawbacks

  • he's REALLY boring and REALLY anal.
  • The guy talks waaay too much.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews over several years are detailed and mostly consistent, but they are old.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART3512 reviews
ART3602 reviews
PHOTO012 reviews
ART3501 review
ART3651 review
Show 2 more courses
PHOTO1 review
PHOTOGRAPH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values