AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Johnson

PHIL100 · PHIL300 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle long lectures and want a knowledgeable professor with manageable tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeableLong LecturesEasy TestsHelpfulCan Be Boring
  • Johnson is knowledgeable and covers philosophy material well.
  • Lectures can be long, repetitive, and hard to stay engaged with.
  • Tests are described as easy, but evidence .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The , but the small sample keeps confidence limited.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material seems manageable because tests are easy, though long lectures may make focus harder.

, and they are mixed on engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

One student says he is helpful if you miss class, but .

Attendance flexibility evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Students respect his knowledge, but lecture style creates real hesitation for some students.

Recommendation and is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

because tests are directly described as easy.

Format shift

Only .

Workload

Moderate

66/100

Reviews mention lectures and tests but do not describe a .

Format shift

All and is sparse.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is knowledgeable and helpful, but one review says his repetitive lecturing loses attention.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only and mixed across two reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests are the only clearly mentioned assessment method, while .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

tests but uneven engagement.

Main concern

The main concern is lecture pacing, because one student says he talks too long and loses attention.

What students said

“ and if you miss class or something.”
PHIL300
“He can talk! And talk and talk and talk about one subject for longer than what I thought what was possible.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say tests are easy, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or .

Easy Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove exam format or restrictions.

Easy Tests
“ and if you miss class or something.”
PHIL300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Interesting guy who lectures the entire class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“He can go off topic but he covers the material well.”

📈

78/100

“ and if you miss class or something.”

⚠️ Lecture Pacing

45/100

“But he completely loses my attention after about half an hour of repeating himself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting guy who lectures the entire class.
  • He can go off topic but he covers the material well.
  • He can talk! And talk and talk and talk about one subject for longer than what I thought what was possible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and if you miss class or something.
  • Might seem boring at first but definitely a great professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they give limited detail beyond lecture style and tests.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1001 review
PHIL3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values