AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Mary Walker

ACCOU171 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider her only if you are comfortable with limited evidence and a potentially difficult accounting class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunnyLikableSparse evidenceHigh difficulty
  • The only review is positive and says the class is enjoyable.
  • The difficulty rating is high, but the comment gives no detail about why.
  • Evidence is too limited to make a strong recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The high difficulty rating suggests an A may require real effort, and the comment gives no evidence of .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course appears challenging based on the difficulty rating, despite the positive tone.

, so format comparison is not possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

The only student liked the class, but the evidence is too thin for a strong recommendation.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , and the high difficulty rating prevents assuming leniency.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is not described, but the difficulty rating suggests the course may not feel light.

Format shift

The only evidence is an .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

The student liked her personality, but the comment is too short to prove strong teaching quality.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention assignments or exams, so the .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review is positive but too brief .

Main concern

There is only one vague review, and the course is rated difficult.

What students said

“She is funny. I like her class a lot.”
ACCOU171

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or .

No clear exam evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is funny. I like her class a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Impression

58/100

“She is funny. I like her class a lot.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

58/100

“She is funny. I like her class a lot.”

📉 Evidence Limit

25/100

“She is funny. I like her class a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Tone

  • She is funny. I like her class a lot.

Theme 2

👍 About Student Satisfaction

  • She is funny. I like her class a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCOU1711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values