AI Rate Professor

Electronics

David Lawrence

ELEC111 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and structured expectations from a knowledgeable instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableLong lecturesClosed-book testsHelpful reviewLate penalties
  • The single review says he is knowledgeable and .
  • Lectures ran long and .
  • Tests were closed-book and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The course seems manageable, but and late penalties mean grades require steady effort.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The , though long lectures may reduce clarity and lab time.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

The student leans positive because he is knowledgeable and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Late work is penalized, but reviewing answers and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The review mentions tests and assignments but does not describe an unusually heavy workload.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is described as knowledgeable and helpful, though lectures sometimes ran too long.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The review mentions both closed-book tests and .

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only in-person review is mostly positive but , and late penalties.

Main concern

Lectures may run too long and assessments are not especially flexible.

What students said

“Very knowledgeable, althought lectures went too long.”
ELEC111
“ .”
ELEC111
“Penalized for late assignments.”
ELEC111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The only review explicitly says tests were closed-book, making the .

Closed-Book Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not mention proctoring or final format.

Closed-Book Tests
“ .”
ELEC111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very knowledgeable, althought lectures went too long.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Very knowledgeable, althought lectures went too long.”

📝

35/100

“ .”

⚖️

58/100

“Penalized for late assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable, althought lectures went too long.
  • In all fairness, would go .

Theme 2

📈

  • .
  • Penalized for late assignments.
  • 70/30% positive toward taking another class of his.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is too thin for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ELEC1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values