AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zach Cembellin

MATH220 · MATH222 · MATH165 · MATH110 · MATH125 · MATH110J · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a strong math teacher and are willing to work steadily for the grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math teacherHelpfulHard work requiredFair but demandingFunny and engaging
  • Most students describe him as , and helpful.
  • Getting an A and .
  • A , but positive reviews dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students repeatedly say an A , and performing well on frequent quizzes or tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is manageable with , but students still describe real challenge and steady work.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course easiness evidence is based entirely on classroom comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

, and no review contradicts it.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him because he teaches clearly, helps students, and makes class engaging despite demanding work.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grading appears fair for prepared students, but some students found quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Several students mention lots of , and required math lab hours.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews describe him as , and strong at teaching math.

Format shift

Teaching quality .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and math lab work, with quizzes appearing especially common.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students praising clear teaching and help while , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that the class is not an easy A and and .

What students said

“ , but he does not make it easy”
MATH220
“ .”
MATH110
“It is not an easy A.”
MATH222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent quizzes and tests, but they .

Frequent QuizzesTests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove the exact exam format or book policy.

Frequent QuizzesTests Mentioned
“ ”
MATH125
“2 quizzes a week with 5 questions, grades fairly.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but he does not make it easy”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He teaches very clearly and if you don't understand, he will help you till you get it.”

📈 Grade Effort

42/100

“It is not an easy A.”

⚖️

48/100

“ and doesnt give you any slack”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really good at teaching the subject, you can tell hes very intelligent, somewhat conceited.
  • and did a good job making sure you learned to think about the subject.
  • He really knows what he is doing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , but he does not make it easy
  • It is not an easy A.
  • He makes you work hard and do a lot of homework, but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Personality

  • He is a , and helpful professor.
  • He's funny, really likes math so that makes him a good teacher.
  • He is super cool,funny and smart.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several courses give consistent , and classroom style, though the reviews are old.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1104 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH2202 reviews
MATH2222 reviews
MATH110J1 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values