AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Mary Frances Walker

ACTG171 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning independently from very limited student feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow pacingHard to followLimited evidence
  • The only review says the class pace is too slow to follow.
  • There is not enough evidence .
  • The low quality rating suggests a poor teaching experience, but credibility is limited by one brief review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

There is , so the A effort cannot be judged beyond the average difficulty rating.

, and it does not discuss grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course may feel harder because the teaching pace is difficult to follow, not because the content is clearly advanced.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The only student comment is negative and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is .

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review gives no workload details, so .

Format shift

No online reviews exist, and the .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The only review says the professor is too slow to follow, indicating weak teaching clarity.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is not clearly supported in the in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says the professor is too slow to follow.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear pacing that makes the class .

What students said

“too slow to follow”
ACTG171

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, difficulty, open-book rules, or proctoring rules.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“too slow to follow”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“too slow to follow”

👍 Recommendation Signal

30/100

“too slow to follow”

📚 Evidence Depth

18/100

“too slow to follow”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • too slow to follow

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • too slow to follow

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one , so conclusions are weak and mostly reflect a single complaint.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACTG1711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values