AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

M Bazigos

ENG · ESL826 · ENGLISH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with inconsistent teaching quality and limited evidence about current class expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsEasy CourseFun TeacherPossible DisorganizationLow Detail
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with one calling the class lazy and boring while another remembers the teacher positively.
  • The course appears easy based on low difficulty ratings, but .
  • Credibility is low because the reviews are old, sparse, and include one no-comment rating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Low difficulty ratings suggest an easy grade, but comments do not clearly prove a free A or .

, and no online reviews are available.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The class appears low in difficulty, though comments focus more on teaching quality than content challenge.

Only in-person reviews describe the class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

No review in .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on tolerance for mixed teaching quality because reviews range from disaster to great and fun.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low and one reported grade is a B-, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

The course seems easy and low-pressure, with .

Format shift

Workload and is sparse.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching reviews are split between a very negative lazy and boring report and a positive great, fun teacher report.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and boring class to a great and fun teacher.

Main concern

Teaching quality may be inconsistent or .

What students said

“This teacher is soooo lazy!”
ESL826
“Mary is a great, fun teacher, took her class couple years ago, but still remember her as a great person.”
ENG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mary is a great, fun teacher, took her class couple years ago, but still remember her as a great person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching impressions and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Mary is a great, fun teacher, took her class couple years ago, but still remember her as a great person.”

⚠️ Mixed Experience

52/100

“This teacher is soooo lazy!”

📉 Course Ease

84/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is soooo lazy!
  • Mary is a great, fun teacher, took her class couple years ago, but still remember her as a great person.

Theme 2

📉 About Class Experience

  • her class is so bored she doesnt care abouth anything, always late.......is a disaster
  • No Comments

Theme 3

📌 About Reliability

  • always late.......is a disaster
  • but still remember her as a great person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews are available, one has no comment, and the detailed comments conflict strongly.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1 review
ENGLISH1 review
ESL8261 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values