AI Rate Professor

English

P. McKenna

ENG100 · ENG848 · ENGL100 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are highly independent and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedPlagiarism AccusationsUnclear GradingRude SarcasmPoor Instruction
  • Most reviews describe him as , and ineffective as an English instructor.
  • Multiple students report plagiarism or cheating accusations and .
  • Workload is not always heavy, but grading and classroom experience feel unfair and stressful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students say doing the work can be enough, but , and unpredictable essay evaluation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself may not be advanced, but poor instruction and should be.

All course evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews mention attending class, no-shows, and drops, but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance-related experience, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The dominant student advice is to stay away because of , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly describe unfair, unclear, or and several report plagiarism or cheating accusations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload includes frequent essays, but at least one review says homework .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments say he does not teach clearly, rambles, is disorganized, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, writing assignments, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe a disorganized English class with , and repeated plagiarism accusations.

Main concern

Students often felt they learned little and could not predict or control their grades.

What students said

“He does not actually instruct, he just rambles on & on.”
ENG100
“I found it very hard to understand how I could get an A.”
ENG100
“he also acused me of plagiarism!”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam structure.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading, and do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does not actually instruct, he just rambles on & on.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He does not actually instruct, he just rambles on & on.”

⚖️

18/100

“I found it very hard to understand how I could get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Stay out of this class - you have been warned.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not actually instruct, he just rambles on & on.
  • He doesn't really teach the class.
  • .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • I did all my workx, attended class everyday and stil lcould not figure out what he was talking about.
  • he also acused me of plagiarism!

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Experience

  • Just a complete waste of time.
  • Every class was a trainwrek.
  • He no-showed for the 1st class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across several years show , and poor instruction.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG10014 reviews
ENGL1004 reviews
ENG8481 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1