AI Rate Professor

Cosmetology

Deborah Baker

Courses not reported · 0 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
0.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
0.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and a harsh classroom tone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude ToneChanging RulesUnclear ExpectationsSo Many PapersLow Course Knowledge
  • The review describes the professor as rude, condescending, and difficult to please.
  • Rules and expectations reportedly change weekly, making the course feel unpredictable.
  • Despite the reported A- grade, the student experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

The A- grade shows a good grade is possible, but changing expectations and being nearly impossible to please make the effort cost high.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content may not be the main barrier, but and perceived weak teaching make it harder to navigate.

, and it points to difficulty from instruction and rules rather than content alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

The single , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

because the review reports rude treatment, changing rules, weak knowledge, and an almost impossible standard to satisfy.

Recommendation evidence and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The student earned an A-, but the comments describe shifting expectations and a teacher who is nearly impossible to please.

Format shift

, and it suggests harsh grading behavior despite the reported grade.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The So many papers tag and changing expectations suggest a heavy and frustrating workload.

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions workload, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The review describes rude treatment, condescension, weak course knowledge, and unstable expectations.

Format shift

All teaching and is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The So burden mentioned.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , shifting expectations, and weak course knowledge.

Main concern

The main concern is unpredictable rules and a condescending teaching style.

What students said

“Very rude and condescending towards all students.”
761
“She changes her rules and expectations weekly and gets overly upset when people forget said changes.”
761

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very rude and condescending towards all students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and expectations. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Very rude and condescending towards all students.”

⚖️

18/100

“She changes her rules and expectations weekly and gets overly upset when people forget said changes.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Nearly impossible to please.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very rude and condescending towards all students.
  • Treats her students like they have no idea what they're talking about, although she seemingly has no knowledge about the esthetics course she is teaching.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Rules and Expectations

  • She changes her rules and expectations weekly and gets overly upset when people forget said changes.
  • Nearly impossible to please.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

0

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it is recent and detailed about classroom problems.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

7611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values