AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Yeng Yang

ETH1 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
85%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you write strong, expansive discussion posts and ; be more cautious online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDiscussion-post heavyGo above and beyond gradingGet ready to readCaring when you follow guidelinesParticipation matters
  • In-person students often call ETH-1 easy and if they read and follow his writing guidelines.
  • and frequently require going beyond the prompt for .
  • Online reviews are more polarized, with several students and even dropping.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many earn As by completing readings and following his substantive writing checklist, but full credit often requires going above the prompt.

In-person students more often report easy As; online students .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

; the challenge is reading volume and lengthy discussion writing, not abstract theory.

; online adds heavier word-count complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews say attendance is mandatory, with at least one report of a student being dropped for absences.

In-person comments ; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Strong majority would take him again for care and clear structure, tempered .

In-person recommendations are warmer; online reviews split between easy pacing and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

He can be generous if you meet his checklist, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online reviews more often call him a ; and supportive.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly reading plus lengthy discussion posts and exam cramming.

Format shift

Online posts of around 500-1000 words feel heavier; some in-person students call work light if .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many praise organized classes, interesting lectures, and care for students, while and .

Format shift

Teaching praise is stronger in person; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Discussion posts and and very few traditional tests.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly weight discussions near half the grade; and two papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ETH-1 is often described as , and passable with reading, discussions, and ; attendance and participation matter.

Main concern

Discussion posts and participation expectations can feel high, and some say he is slow to answer emails.

What students said

“If you do what's assigned on time you'll do well!”
ETH-1
“He always expects his students to go beyond the prompt for the and the ”
ETH-1
“Very laid back and chill. but if you a valid excuse... he'll excuse it.”
ETH-1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some find pacing easy with quizzes and discussions, while others report heavy word counts, vague full-credit standards, and withdrawals.

Main concern

Discussion posts can demand going above and beyond with , and some students report .

What students said

“If you want full points for a and beyond" you can't just simply respond to the questions or you ”
ETH-1
“ . Has NO clear grading criteria for .”
ETH-1
“For this online course, it was fairly easy... as you have 3 tries.”
ETH-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk is writing standards more than proctored exams; .

Discussion postsTwo major papersQuizzes with multiple attemptsFew traditional tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report few tests, weekly discussions, reading questions, and .

Weekly discussion postsTwo papersVery few tests
“Lots of reading and and papers”
ETH-1
“ .”
ETH-1

Online

, and a final project; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Discussion posts heavyQuizzes with 3 triesFinal project or reflection video
“Online class consists of .”
ETH-1
“ as you have 3 tries.”
ETH-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Yang really cares about helping you pass. He checks in , and as long as you follow his writing guidelines, you'll be fine in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 ETH-1 reviews, balancing strong in-person . Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Yang is consistently well-prepared, and .”

45/100

“ . lots of reading and writing to respond to a discussion post (1,000 words).”

Recommendation Split

78/100

“ !”

28/100

“ ! One of my group members was dropped mid-semester.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are interesting and you really do learn a lot from him

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Grades

  • expect to "go above and beyond"
  • Overall, very easy if on top of it
  • Discussion posts 50% of grade, quizzes 10%

Theme 3

About Support and Access

  • and amazingly supportive
  • He checks in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty recent ETH-1 reviews with rich detail show a stable split pattern: supportive structure overall, with .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ETH-120 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 5 · A 9

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2