AI Rate Professor

Art

Georgesse Gomez

ARTB2 · ART12A · ART1A · ART3 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take her if ; and inconsistent teaching make this a high-risk pick.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExpectationsTough GraderLecture HeavyPolarizing FeedbackBoring Tangents
  • Many students say expectations and .
  • A minority praise her care and , so experiences swing hard by course and section.
  • while lectures often feel off-topic or personal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Several students still earned As, but and guessing what she wants.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from easy weekly discussion posts to confusing project standards with little instructional clarity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and participation as a graded factor.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and repeated complaints about unclear teaching outweigh the few glowing design-course reviews.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and students say criticism comes without paths to improve.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Some sections feel light with weekly posts, while .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Lectures are often called boring or off-topic, with only occasional praise for feedback and care.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews split between students who felt belittled or and a and growth-focused in design courses.

Main concern

, and occasional unprofessional classroom moments.

What students said

“ she shows you A, B and C work but doesn't give feedback on how to improve”
art3
“She likes to make an example of students in front of the class and makes you feel belittled”
ARTB2
“She gives many references/student examples of the projects that she assigns, instructive lectures, demonstrates techniques”
ART12A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and participation; .

Project-BasedParticipation HeavyLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mainly discuss projects, finals, and participation rather than a .

Project-BasedParticipation Heavy
“Refused to grade my final at the end of the semester because she ran out of time”
art1a
“the class itself is very easy with ”
ARTB2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gomez is a great person but her class can be very difficult at times since she isn't clear on what she wants on the assignments”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and polarizing classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“ ”

⚖️

32/100

“Gives criticism without giving feedback on how her students can improve”

👍 Recommendation Signal

28/100

“ and pay again”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Insanely boring lectures that are just about her personal travels around the world
  • Lectures mainly include art that she likes
  • Professor goes on many tangents

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is easy to fail her class just as it is to pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She also shows so much care and support for the success of her students
  • makes you feel belittled
  • undermines women while speaking highly of males

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but opinions are highly split and sample size is modest.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ARTB24 reviews
art33 reviews
ART12A1 review
art1a1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1