AI Rate Professor

English

Rhea Mendoza

ENG2 · ENG1A · ENG1 · ENG1ENG2 · END1A · ENG1B · ENG101 · ENGL1001 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
59.46%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want rigorous writing training and and picky grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough nitpicky graderClear rubrics and feedbackHeavy essay loadFast 8-week pacePolarizing personality
  • Strict essay standards and frequent papers make As hard even .
  • Dedicated students who revise, use the lab, and follow rubrics often improve writing and pass with B or A.
  • Online and compressed sections amplify stress; several students call her condescending or unhelpful under pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong effort often yields B-range grades; she docks minor mistakes and few call the A easy.

Both formats report tough essay scoring; online nitpicking complaints are especially sharp.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and fast 8-week pacing make the intellectual and time load high.

Online short sessions feel hardest; and SI hours.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and note SI session requirements tied to success.

In-person is clearly attendance-heavy; some .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 59% would take again; lovers credit real writing growth while critics refuse the pickiness and tone.

In-person has more mixed-to-positive growth stories; online has a larger share of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and wording errors even when rubrics are clear.

Format shift

Online students more often report zeros or 9.9/10 nitpicks; some in-person courses allow resubmits.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

So , and dense reading dominate nearly every recent review.

Format shift

8-week online and .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and , but tone is polarizing and sometimes cold.

Format shift

In-person energy and SI help get more praise; online help quality is more disputed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and continuous writing tasks rather than traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and tough but growth-oriented essay grading with strong classroom energy for some.

Main concern

and high workload punish anyone who cannot spend hours revising each week.

What students said

“She is a but always gives you time to revise and resubmit for full credit with feedback.”
ENG1A
“ if you have small children or other classes.”
END1A

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and revision chances, , and 8-week overload.

Main concern

Harsh zeros, banned-word nitpicks, and dense weekly writing make the short term feel brutal.

What students said

“Great teacher, if you follow how she tells you to format your essays exactly you will pass the class easily.”
ENG1A
“Her course was only 8 weeks, and those were the toughest 8 weeks of my life. She was very nit picking with what you wrote down.”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers with strict criteria; .

Essay heavyClear rubricsRevision for credit sometimesOpen-note final mentionedNo proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one student notes an open-note final.

Essay revisionsOpen-note finalSI session hours
“The .”
ENG2
“She has printouts of her expectations and .”
ENG1A

Online

and module work rather than webcam or Lockdown exams.

Weekly papersModule slidesStrict essay format
“if you follow how she tells you to format your essays exactly you will pass the class easily.”
ENG1A
“nit-picking the most minimal mistakes to the point she grades 9.9/10 is absolutely ridiculous.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a but always gives you time to revise and resubmit for full credit with feedback. She is very easy to reach when you have any questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 English reviews across online and in-person formats, . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Amazing professor. Unlike many of my other professors she always took the time to check in with her students.”

⚖️

28/100

“She is also EXTREMELY .”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“IF YOU STRUGGLE WITH WRITING OR .”

📝 Workload Reality

26/100

“those were the toughest 8 weeks of my life. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not many students can earn an A in her class.
  • If you struggle even a little with .
  • She makes you improve... .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality Risk

  • Very picky and
  • 2 faced passive aggressive she will straight up give you a zero
  • From the start, she was very condescending

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a and polarization to trust the split portrait.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG1A18 reviews
ENG1B13 reviews
ENG211 reviews
END1A2 reviews
ENG12 reviews
Show 4 more courses
21 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1ENG21 review
Engl10011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

16

B+ 6 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1