AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Raylene Potter

MATH233 · MAT13 · MATH16 · MATH123 · MATH25 · MATH24 · MATH242 · MATH6 · MATH201 · MATH13 · MATH0 · MAT123 · MATH402 · MATH5 · MAT2 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid if you can; only take her if no other option and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework hellDoes not teach wellTough graderTest heavySelf-teach required
  • Majority of 39 reviews , and .
  • Many students say you teach yourself from the book while .
  • A minority praise office hours, support classes, or easier calc sections, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A is possible only with and self-study; many .

; the one online review also describes extreme difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High average difficulty with , and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Many sections mark attendance mandatory or skip-class-you-wont-pass; some list optional.

Mostly in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about 20% would take again; dominant advice is find another instructor.

Negative consensus across in-person and the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; reports of zeroed exams, regrades, and no partial credit leniency.

Format shift

In-person complaints are strongest; .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Repeated lots of , and multi-hour weekly loads.

Format shift

Both formats report homework hell.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Many say she does problems without explaining, redirects to tutors/book, or lectures poorly.

Format shift

In-person sample is large and mostly negative; one online agrees she does not teach.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

and occasional projects.

Format shift

In-person focused; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math often described as and ; a few students still succeed with huge effort or support class.

Main concern

Unclear teaching, regrading risk, and .

What students said

“she randomly regraded everything and tanked my grade”
MATH16
“she did such a poor job teaching that our class average for the final was 45%.”
MATH201
“Genuinely the entire life.”
MATH5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online MATH5 review reports extreme homework, paid access materials, and self-teaching with no real instruction.

Main concern

Teach yourself with and heavy stress even if you pass.

What students said

“Prepare for teaching yourself, because she does not teach at all.”
MATH5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard, poorly aligned with weak lectures, and high-stakes; not student-friendly overall.

Test heavyHard midterms/finalsStudy guides sometimes helpOne note paper allowed in some sectionsHomework harder than exams for some

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some sections offer study guides or one note sheet, but many say lectures do not prepare you.

Hard testsStudy guide sometimesOne note paper (some)Test heavy
“our class average for the final was 45%.”
MATH201
“all the numbers that were on the practice test.”
MATH16
“ she doesn't cover in class.”
MATH24

Online

Single online review does not detail proctoring; stresses self-teaching and .

Test heavySelf-taught prep
“Prepare for teaching yourself, because she does not teach at all.”
MATH5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely the entire life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews (38 in-person, 1 online), weighting the strong , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

26/100

“Prepare for teaching yourself, because she does not teach at all.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“If SO!!”

📚

15/100

“Two words; !”

⚖️

22/100

“she randomly regraded everything and tanked my .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • silence while solving a 20 step problem so yeah this is basically how u do it
  • Most learning will have to be done on your own because she very much.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Take her class If you want to fail or barely pass.
  • .
  • class average for the final was 45%.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Every week I spent at least 5 to 10 hours on homework.
  • Ridiculous amount of
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews over many years with a and , and only sparse positive outliers.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 521

Course coverage

MATH57 reviews
MATH2014 reviews
MATH244 reviews
MAT133 reviews
MAT23 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH163 reviews
MATH2333 reviews
403792 reviews
MATH1232 reviews
math62 reviews
MAT1231 review
MATH01 review
MATH131 review
MATH2421 review
MATH251 review
MATH4021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3