AI Rate Professor

Music

Alexis Olsen

MUS7 · MUS8 · MUS5 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

; only consider in person if you want a low-effort music elective and can tolerate cancellations.

Best fit · Easy A HunterOften cancels or lateOnline ghosting riskEasy A in personLow effort gradingDisorganized communication
  • with casual projects and frequent cancellations.
  • Recent online reviews report ghosting, locked assignments, and almost no instructor support.
  • Grades stay high for many students, but teaching effort and reliability are widely criticized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report easy As with light work or averaged grades, though a few failed sections .

In person is clearly easy A; online still yields high grades despite chaos and weak teaching.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Music survey content is described as easy to understand with light intellectual demand for most sections.

Both formats rate content easy; pain comes from organization, not hard concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others say just show up when class is not canceled.

In person often has cancelations and mixed mandatory tags; online is largely asynchronous but unreliable.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

and recent comments warn against online especially after ghosting and poor support.

; online reviews strongly discourage.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students say and easy As are common despite weak instruction.

Format shift

Online notes open-note tests and ; in person is often graded by few easy items.

Workload

Light

62/100

Workload is often light or low-point busywork, though .

Format shift

In person is light with few tasks; .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

some find him funny and chill, many report no effort, late work, or total disappearance.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of , and occasional paper dumps depending on section.

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and papers; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

with chill vibe, but many note frequent cancellations and light prep.

Main concern

Last-minute cancellations frustrate commuters and some sections feel under-taught.

What students said

“Its an easy A. Gives quizzes, but so...”
MUS8
“easiest class every. just show up and its an easy A.”
MUS8
“ . AND expected us the only pass the class with Finals.”
MUS7

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative about disappearing for , and poor accessibility.

Main concern

Instructor may vanish mid-term and dump work later with little response.

What students said

“he ghosted the class for 2 weeks, ”
MUS5
“He never opened up assignments for about 4 weeks.”
MUS5
“Felt like he put no effort into the class from the though it was an online class.”
MUS7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often open-note or at home, with some sections using a .

Open-note quizzesAt-home quizzesGroup final projectAuto gradingListening exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and easy final essays or group projects rather than strict closed-book exams.

At-home quizzesGroup finalEasy final essay/project
“Gives quizzes, but so...”
MUS8
“The and with it”
MUS8

Online

Online students mention open-note quizzes and , with no clear webcam proctoring described.

Open-note quizzesOpen-note testsAuto grading on final
“Open-note quizzes and tests.”
MUS7
“ was horrible”
MUS5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a professor. Lots of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting easy grades versus reliability failures. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Reliability Issues

25/100

“even though it was an easy class, I want to highlight his flaws, he ghosted the class for 2 weeks”

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Felt like he put no effort into the class from the though it was an online class.”

🅰️ Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“easiest class every. just show up and its an easy A.”

👎 Recommendation

38/100

“I wouldn't wish this on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was super chill and funny.
  • He makes it easy for you to pass, but you need to do the work.
  • Didn't teach well and .

Theme 2

📉 About Online Chaos

  • He never opened up assignments for about 4 weeks.
  • he ghosted the class for 2 weeks,
  • Teacher was very last minute with assignments.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Its an easy A.
  • .
  • everything was averaged so i ended up getting an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 12 reviews with a sharp and recent harsh online reports lowers confidence.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MUS85 reviews
MUS54 reviews
MUS73 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values