AI Rate Professor

Communication

Alexis Thrower

COM1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this COM-1 section unless you thrive with zero hand-holding and can absorb a tough grade hit.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear ExpectationsHeavy WorkloadDrops StudentsUnprofessional
  • Most , and zero late-work policy.
  • Daily assignments and speech videos create heavy stress with little teaching support.
  • A minority praise accommodation if you communicate early; majority urge withdrawal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and speech nitpicking make an A rare even with effort.

Nearly all evidence is from online reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students say and expects you to figure criteria alone.

Online reviews drive the hard-content signal; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory or ; others report optional attendance.

Online reports of .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students say do not register, rate her near zero, and report stress or withdrawal.

Recommendation is almost entirely negative online; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tags and comments call her a and hides criteria.

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints are almost all from online COM-1.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Daily assignments, many papers, and speech videos stack into a heavy load with no late work.

Format shift

Workload complaints concentrate in online sections.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Majority say she does not teach, ignores questions, and feels unprofessional or uncaring.

Format shift

Two recent 5-star reviews (one online, one in person) sit against seven 1-star online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades hinge on speech videos, frequent papers, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single in-person and fair late-work rules.

Main concern

, so the positive signal is thin.

What students said

“she had a what her expectations were about turning in work on time or contacting her before deadlines.”
COM-1

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online COM-1 is widely described as chaotic, strict on deadlines, and low on support; near failing.

Main concern

, and possible drop for inactivity.

What students said

“if you care . She's very strict and isn't even specific on what she wants.”
COM-1
“Took the class online, had assignments almost every day due for her class, and did not accept late work under any circumstances.”
COM-1
“Dropped me exactly at 12 am because I was inactive.”
COM-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on graded speech videos and frequent assignments; .

Speech Video FinalsDaily AssignmentsNo Late Work

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The syllabus expectations.

Syllabus Quiz
“she had a what her expectations were about turning in work on time”
COM-1

Online

Online students describe speech video grading, nitpicking, and .

Speech Video GradingDaily AssignmentsNo Late Work
“She waits until the very last and nitpicks any minor mistake you make throughout your speech.”
COM-1
“Only one person in the entire class got an A, and it was a low A. Everyone else got C or below the mean grade was a 37.6.”
COM-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you care . She's very strict and isn't even specific on what she wants.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (8 online, 1 in , and dropout risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Doesnt actually teach information kind of throws out the assignment and leaves us to figure it out.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ . she had a terrible attitude and does not care about her students.”

⚖️

18/100

“ videos.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and expects us to figure it out ourselves
  • She never answered any questions or
  • if you attend office hours or schedule 1:1s

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • mean grade was a 37.6

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • I've never felt more disrespected or discriminated against
  • Dropped me exactly at 12 am because I was inactive
  • I'd rate her a 0 if I could

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews with strong negative consistency online, but and polarized quality scores.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

COM-19 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1